From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F4CB9F0 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 21:11:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B98E61A0 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 21:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id o18-v6so12235870wmc.0 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 14:11:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ICvre3QPXqgpI0+wFjwS3DTc3UyxrSHh8bo6W9w9sGM=; b=fbx8hgJDWE74V3fJuRqnvKhiJ9Sv1P0wQlkpYL7pDP6/wCUjkU4qb8nzt2zRurb94l 2pvUr78VIs+iPiFuBILWbZ4Jz4WagYvWC8P7qtZnc/rTQHGmcHcE3ITadCaLNw9dpiRU 7w8dUGZKJKSum/9SnSXaU3mN+yqT0rcXJyjuKNfB0SaOrDu8XhRu9NfpU08ck8pcvijk eROaVPq2lEc30Vu0IZi7x8TEoHa3Yx/FQ0jvq+WYNiaJS/83sHryNYAv4jdoeoPyuQh/ n4Fl/sJQrSQNqBOaV9sXXmUZzjFGJDBOlmMkjJaFQWkvDY/g4Y+f2uvwOyYqEZ4mL9C1 /HGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=ICvre3QPXqgpI0+wFjwS3DTc3UyxrSHh8bo6W9w9sGM=; b=N7IVSSNnDmHRpgN0xU/k9lBZsXKRoZpSmMKO+DutWTiJMXCX3bABAhMNd39ce65rsl jjyr4z1UaQVrhjzy/u4BLxLJVn9DYrt2Aa+/GAnhkae9cjSU9QL69gAXr9xhKa0GRZCW /EYm6pcZzSXLsUDY3GfMmnryGcUW4HMZKJeQA7U84BBef46IiWuHGv+e2TeRMJjnH4gr oxokB5/n4nZI5P8T0/j6WiC/YFydYMBdxhpJF9mEsALs6+Qp5mUfrcC6bWgbk5X0DZbp LXsef6S6wCfg8J4j7domxJLDHu5DTGzvW5DnWaEI1xIRUIASV6UpboksfpO1We8DvBk+ vPZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHA9pcEHyCRe1Fh5FaI0kGQ/Ooev8vkRRKjocjsNJZly8gZhHzF 4cMMTmohiF1VuNhSXs4/oU6jFYJ6+LNIuOhVOWfYMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpftr90YDA/WGvHe0xsBNADOrkmZREyPzaKvFEdlLaXKs/Kgp1kfzOcYzBTl3cC/EyNgf8yhjkTCRvh6ODyLT3E= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:588c:: with SMTP id m134-v6mr9610615wmb.154.1533503497908; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: lautaro.dragan@gmail.com From: Lautaro Dragan Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 18:11:26 -0300 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:21:43 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Claiming an OP_RETURN Prefix X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:11:40 -0000 --0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi everyone, My name's Lautaro and I'm currently acting as Tech Lead of Po.et . At Po.et we use colored coins to store data on the Bitcoin blockchain with prefix "POET". I've read in an old version of the OP_RETURN entry of the bitcoin wiki that *protocols wishing to claim OP_RETURN prefixes should use the standard Bitcoin Improvement Proposals process*. That entry seems to have changed recently , no longer stating that we should follow the BIP process, and I haven't been able to find any existing BIP claiming an OP_RETURN prexif, but for the sake of thoroughness I'd like to ask for your help or confirmation here. Should we actually be using the BIP process to claim a prefix? Thanks in advance, Lautaro --0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyone,

My name's Lautaro and = I'm currently acting as Tech Lead of Po.et. At Po.et we use colored coins=C2=A0t= o store data on the Bitcoin blockchain with prefix "POET".
<= div>
I've read in an old version of the OP_RETURN = entry of the bitcoin wiki that=C2=A0protocols wishing to claim OP_RE= TURN prefixes should use the standard Bitcoin Improvement Proposals process= .

That entry seems to have changed recently, no l= onger stating that we should follow the BIP process, and I haven't been= able to find any existing BIP claiming an OP_RETURN prexif, but for the sa= ke of thoroughness I'd like to ask for your help or confirmation here.<= /div>

Should we actually be using the BIP process to cla= im a prefix?

Thanks in advance,

Lautaro
--0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5--