From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VQDYR-0007R4-EG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:44:43 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.217.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.178; envelope-from=melvincarvalho@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f178.google.com; Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VQDYQ-0002cg-DJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:44:43 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z5so3562845lbh.37 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:44:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.7.100 with SMTP id i4mr629249laa.35.1380447875608; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.159.233 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:44:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2c70dbfc173749cf4198c591f19a7d33@astutium.com> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:44:35 +0200 Message-ID: From: Melvin Carvalho To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c27d8241b57404e782915e X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: doubleclick.net] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (melvincarvalho[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1VQDYQ-0002cg-DJ Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] smart contracts -- possible use case? yes or no? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:44:43 -0000 --001a11c27d8241b57404e782915e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 29 September 2013 10:32, Gavin Andresen wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Neil Fincham wrote: > >> I subscribe to this list so I can keep up-to date with bitcoin >> development, can we keep philosophy and tax evasion out of it? >> > > Yes, that's off-topic for this mailing list. Lets stick to technical > issues that we can solve by writing code. > Hi Gavin, apologies if my post came across as off-topic. My aim was to present a use case, and ask whether or not it was technically feasible using smart contracts. > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most > from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --001a11c27d8241b57404e782915e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 29 September 2013 10:32, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gm= ail.com> wrote:
On Sun, S= ep 29, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Neil Fincham <neil@asdf.co.nz> wrote:=
I subscribe to this list so= I can keep up-to date with bitcoin development, can we keep philosophy and= tax evasion out of it?

Yes, that's off-topic for this m= ailing list. Lets stick to technical issues that we can solve by writing co= de.=A0

Hi Gavin, ap= ologies if my post came across as off-topic.=A0 My aim was to present a use= case, and ask whether or not it was technically feasible using smart contr= acts.
=A0
--
--
Gavin Andresen

-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most fr= om
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register &g= t;
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam= pad/clk?id=3D60133471&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
___________________= ____________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment


--001a11c27d8241b57404e782915e--