From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCBDC002B for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4537860F1B for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:56:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4537860F1B Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=KCo6q/zH X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B7PSEP-79_aj for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 42B5160EC4 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B5160EC4 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com with SMTP id 74so7340220ybl.12 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 11:56:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=86ospYhMB5tZuDVdTwxjgGwkKSV+vXs8qQFM5U39TXw=; b=KCo6q/zHgAy8V0rI+h+XUmH/YjOyjgtwJGrJ+rXQGPaPc/7DvreMgfv5orExW9X1q9 NwFbLsAF7FmHg8AhhazSMGkR3cLFBrHeAr3n1OiBIdwNzQMHvEWkeLKqsocqtiJ567y3 AHnfgfCs823nNYNrl1tIYp3acQ451dBRvZgukyPI+klzKMQhy6yCWS920EcHI1+NgdUu xKtlbd2PDhdu4aRiu3fSNtVNTh09LMF+Fr80/oB1QV+TCHSMN+sJiycmCGq3+W2UWTrd HFuYo8emHnZ5uvtFLHxFK/JlBlYmoBoNjsTebMSkBQHdgVKdyCT9e644P1n7DpBsLvxZ Di0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=86ospYhMB5tZuDVdTwxjgGwkKSV+vXs8qQFM5U39TXw=; b=b32F3mesvMCEaYK7H8wpgU3pZopp1UxD+cOGOcXqmnqR3OTVtr9R2QCVsy6DNl2QKb 5k+l7JvHFjV0RvG0N4G7v7ns7mhvYgif6gntY3cqph4RQiQ2klrGAqcTbyTfFP08acIb JKWZphtem+BsxL/vWicGQh7E0iiMT3wqwxu+7MZAIuQYF+SpqoVXiyO8OdNJIPWoiOKY v8r+Gb9dHnGtzqezaXPlvkbwbjDelre8hkklzEa0LNP7sxT0hheyGxHbplws3DgnWSYH wXEcqwolILu/H+C2nL0AgB2slSkCsxk8Z08WtDbFW5T9yeD3bo1jpn3bpMSg8zMgQ2C7 3zeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXUcOXWy2sVYgxdacJq6kDuT5K9l4Dcsz7HLwAIvUjRosn/m6uc 7llnWY2MADiakoBq9H6spBFa/YbNECxCmX9KkHk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set81+zgVSyzMPxf7dRFJPh55FUXCfMRvysoBusZKLgj/G21P3o1mKAuZoj03Yw4Ph5mTI5ELUo8dSvEqXpPEoiM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:e7d7:0:b0:80b:5988:2042 with SMTP id e206-20020a25e7d7000000b0080b59882042mr1219612ybh.54.1675454189101; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 11:56:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Melvin Carvalho Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 20:56:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: Robert Dickinson , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7688d05f3d1137a" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:16:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 19:56:31 -0000 --000000000000c7688d05f3d1137a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable p=C3=A1 27. 1. 2023 v 13:47 odes=C3=ADlatel Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-de= v < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> napsal: > I'm curious what opinions exist and what actions might be taken by core > developers regarding storing unlimited amounts of NFT (or other?) content > as witness data (https://docs.ordinals.com/inscriptions.html). The > ordinal scheme is elegant and genius IMHO, but when I think about the > future disk use of all unpruned nodes, I question whether unlimited stora= ge > is wise to allow for such use cases. Wouldn't it be better to find a way = to > impose a size limit similar to OP_RETURN for such inscriptions? > > I think it would be useful to link a sat to a deed or other legal > construct for proof of ownership in the real world, so that real property > can be transferred on the blockchain using ordinals, but storing the > property itself on the blockchain seems nonsensical to me. > Low tech solution: miners charge a premium for storing images in the block chain. Say 2x, 5x, 10x. This encourages bitcoin to be used as a financial network, while increasing the security budget. > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --000000000000c7688d05f3d1137a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
p=C3=A1 27. 1. 2023 v=C2=A013:47 odes= =C3=ADlatel Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>= ; napsal:
I'm curious what opinions exist and what actions might be ta= ken by core developers regarding storing unlimited amounts of NFT (or other= ?) content as witness data (https://docs.ordinals.com/inscriptions.html)= . The ordinal scheme is elegant and genius IMHO, but when I think about the= future disk use of all unpruned nodes, I question whether unlimited storag= e is wise to allow for such use cases. Wouldn't it be better to find a = way to impose a size limit similar to OP_RETURN for such inscriptions?
<= br>I think it would be useful to link a sat to a deed or other legal constr= uct for proof of ownership in the real world, so that real property can be = transferred on the blockchain using ordinals, but storing the property itse= lf on the blockchain seems nonsensical to me.
Low tech solution: miners charge a premium for storing images = in the block chain.=C2=A0 Say 2x, 5x, 10x.

This en= courages bitcoin to be used as a financial network, while increasing the se= curity budget.
=C2=A0
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--000000000000c7688d05f3d1137a--