On 2 November 2013 17:26, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
Guys, identity systems for the web are off-topic for this list. Other than the anonymous passports/SINs/fidelity bond ideas, Bitcoin doesn't have any relevance to it.

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Hannu Kotipalo <hannu.kotipalo@iki.fi> wrote:
Maybe this is a bit off-topic, but the *real* answer to the question
"why-is-nobody-using-ssl-client-certificates" is that it would force
www pages to be encrypted and would make it a lot more difficult for
NSA to log www-trafic.

No, it wouldn't. You can log a user in using SSL and then redirect the user back to an encrypted page, using cookies for the rest of the session. Please don't clutter up this list with conspiracy theories. The brutal reality is that identity is a hard problem.

Identity need not be a hard problem.  In my view it is a solved problem.

You have a real world entity translated to a digital format.  Yes that can be slightly ambiguous at time, naming is hard, and people do get this wrong frequently.

The most common problem is to name something in a way that does not scale.  The solution to this problem is rather easy, and that is to use a URI to name something, which makes it global and scalable.

In the case of bitcoin you could have use the bitcion URI scheme

bitcion:1fhdjkfhjksf...
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
Android apps secure.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development