public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Standard for private keys with birth timestamp
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:12:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKxLup6yJEYeC+VL6KMzGZ3DhQzJ0Rs9RJc3CU-UhNKag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130722144458.GA22993@vps7135.xlshosting.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2095 bytes --]

On 22 July 2013 16:44, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I should have brought up this suggestion before, as there seems to be
> relevant other work.
>
> I'd like to propose encoding keys data (whatever type) with a birth
> timestamp as:
>  * <serialized key>@<unix timestamp in decimal>
>
> The reason for not incorporating this inside the key serialization (for
> example BIP32), is because
> birth timestamps are more generally a property of an address, rather than
> the key it is derived from.
> For one, it is useful for non-extended standard serialized private keys,
> but for P2SH addresses,
> the "private key" is really the actual scriptPubKey, but birth data is
> equally useful for this.
>
> Reason for choosing the '@' character: it's not present in the base58,
> hex, or base64 encodings that
> are typically used for key/script data.
>
> One downside is that this means no checksum-protection for the timestamp,
> but the advantage is
> increased genericity. It's also longer than using a binary encoding, but
> this is an optional
> part anyway, and I think "human typing" is already fairly hard anyway.
>

Is there a BIP for this?

@ is normally used in conjunction with things other than a time stamp ...

You may want to look at RFC 4151

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4151.txt

They had an idea on adding time stamps to identifiers.

First impression is that the sacrifice in opacity does not seem to justify
the utility.


>
> --
> Pieter
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3135 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-22 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-22 14:44 [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Standard for private keys with birth timestamp Pieter Wuille
2013-07-22 15:12 ` Melvin Carvalho [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKaEYhKxLup6yJEYeC+VL6KMzGZ3DhQzJ0Rs9RJc3CU-UhNKag@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=melvincarvalho@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pieter.wuille@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox