public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Segwit2x BIP
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:19:35 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKzdR-p2F3HLnU7aV7U645mrCOQ5ye4CWSeyzeb0O0j815QAfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqgve88eE4=dDD8FqGZQNNgRtOvXAhqSTWu_wy4zG+6Eg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2191 bytes --]

The BIP has been updated.

Changes:
- The technical spec has been improved: now the block size increase is
specified in terms of weight and not in terms of bytes.
- The increase in the maximum block sigops after HF has been documented.
- Comments added about the worst case block size.

Happy weekend! And don't forget to start signaling something before block
475776 !  It's just 90 blocks away.
Bit 1 or 4,1 or whatever you wish, but please signal something.

To the moon!


On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 12 Jul 2017 2:31 pm, "Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.
> linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Monday, 10 July 2017 20:38:08 CEST Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > I think anything less than 1 year after release of tested code by some
> > implementation would be irresponsible for any hardfork, even a very
> > simple one.
>
> Good news!
>
> Code to support 2x (the hard fork part of the proposal) has been out and
> tested for much longer than that.
>
>
> Not true. It's different code on top of segwit. The first attempt in btc1
> (very recent) didn't even increased the size (because it changed the
> meaningless "base size" without touching the weight limit. As for the
> current code, I don't think it has been properly tested today, let alone
> "for mucj longer than 1 year.
> Anyway, I said, one year from tested release. Segwitx2 hasn't been
> released, has it? If so, too late to discuss a bip imo, the bip may end up
> being different from what has been released due to feedback (unless it is
> ignored again, of course).
>
>
> --
> Tom Zander
> Blog: https://zander.github.io
> Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4076 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-13 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-07 22:25 [bitcoin-dev] A Segwit2x BIP Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-07-07 22:44 ` Matt Corallo
2017-07-07 23:25   ` Gregory Maxwell
2017-07-07 23:22 ` Gregory Maxwell
2017-07-13  3:10   ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-07-13  3:19     ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-07-07 23:27 ` Luke Dashjr
2017-07-07 23:38   ` Gregory Maxwell
2017-07-08  6:30 ` Erik Aronesty
2017-07-08 13:28 ` Btc Drak
     [not found]   ` <A7FFF8F7-9806-44F1-B68F-F83C44893365@ob1.io>
2017-07-10 11:50     ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-07-10 18:38       ` Jorge Timón
2017-07-12  8:15         ` Tom Zander
2017-07-12 12:38           ` Jonas Schnelli
2017-07-12 17:38           ` Jorge Timón
2017-07-13 19:19             ` Sergio Demian Lerner [this message]
2017-07-13 19:48               ` Andrew Chow
2017-07-13 21:18                 ` Charlie 'Charles' Shrem
2017-07-14 13:50               ` Erik Aronesty
2017-07-12  1:06       ` Luke Dashjr
2017-07-12 15:41         ` Aymeric Vitte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKzdR-p2F3HLnU7aV7U645mrCOQ5ye4CWSeyzeb0O0j815QAfA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox