From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 306AC957 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com (mail-qk0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25A0208 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 18:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k74so9487620qke.1 for ; Tue, 09 May 2017 11:59:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VQMCL+YZH6EoY/qUMmSqL85a0MFCFJENMh5jQv1Pc08=; b=Z5mEPhjobrB0P/j9vYDQIZ0i4u39FcWbryq05z9lB0WtwZShP9+215VCHNNZOZzyyH G5kba8+S19cYz6MBSJbJ4WFOC+OSYxUoNE7in5Sc5Hn6mRqQbOyoflqWB6UUE23bKSDi aJhyF2PAEhRkJrZlyinxWUUEsR6YcOxS6n2kjcLnpIVZDMexTNq5vw/iq5OMUuzxaMko 1Z/C15eL0dUqXXv5Kgeev5JjJ+7av6sUOmWKCeQZQtQ8+087TZbnsXCru6yXdn+FRzn4 MVjev11qoxNxVXVEdprC1jKG/XHEsYtl/cn7GnqiGGTYgeZpn82uKXj41IyaGsmeoAVC AnRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VQMCL+YZH6EoY/qUMmSqL85a0MFCFJENMh5jQv1Pc08=; b=IsKjnYWuZJwtpa6tIsRd64furrjN6BXiOyxj5gc6zwNSFibI80lk9B2xgVKxWGmmU+ 3sDIQWYbRexlCPXqRm3PwGzDmyN+zEQDHA3ZVvcd5xOG8ULsPmQH/e5Iiz0LQEvykTxQ wmvNyJ9CRP8Jvi1A3dnHB8ifjxfvgK7vaYqV5hKtFCnM4zTK7fFsrzaZWm8qcOeuk67u FbwtMxO9Z3RnokFOSQVhQ5SCU2G2v3luQgjCLZ8wkdQw/C0qqF83ECtNPTd709l4Qvrn aFtOg3nKXFVvEsipwlaw9VvruOaehYC2JLIF6SNIE8/EBH8U6Wx82KiLGIIFubbrY/MP ZfIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC0dvoPHiFE8Zt2KQqg6dTmyeSRkJ/77p+TJJq4R7NpYqk5pD3N ktZOJsrqN+d0+7f5IWmv7pvkRlAOHg== X-Received: by 10.55.100.200 with SMTP id y191mr1702461qkb.87.1494356346099; Tue, 09 May 2017 11:59:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.165.132 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2017 11:58:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sergio Demian Lerner Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 15:58:25 -0300 Message-ID: To: Matt Corallo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0599302d62f1054f1bf3e2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some real-world results about the current Segwit Discount X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 18:59:07 -0000 --94eb2c0599302d62f1054f1bf3e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > You suggested "If the maximum block weight is set to 2.7M, each byte of > non-witness block costs 1.7", but these numbers dont work out - setting > the discount to 1.7 gets you a maximum block size of 1.7MB (in a soft > fork), not 2.7MB. Yes. In a soft-fork is true. I was thinking about what a HF could do to optimize the balance, and I forgot I was in the context of a SF. --94eb2c0599302d62f1054f1bf3e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


You suggested "If the maximum block weight is set to 2.7M, each byte o= f
non-witness block costs 1.7", but these numbers dont work out - settin= g
the discount to 1.7 gets you a maximum block size of 1.7MB (in a soft
fork), not 2.7MB.

Yes. In a soft-fork is t= rue.
I was thinking about what a HF could do to optimize the bala= nce, and I forgot I was in the context of a SF.

= =C2=A0
--94eb2c0599302d62f1054f1bf3e2--