From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6331B1F for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 20:59:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qt0-f174.google.com (mail-qt0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0998157 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 20:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f174.google.com with SMTP id j29so11784550qtj.1 for ; Tue, 09 May 2017 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e+rHfhQYTzQjupwUYqi6PKfQaJsLc87OPHgSOxOS2UE=; b=KgxoqZ41t1rlyAKNdWgJ1vZXuo7yB91RPeBDXlHfBzPIauSoaIhftnAjAhwjuVmx8+ XpWK9DWyaj7A60pFfWq5Q+gzBjTib4kTbbSOGXgGmfjUIxZbVwMkpTMu7IreV2mbUhuM m+ULHFAscApUQVD9cmJfcX24rWcP7aA3jmFcY5QWMnRbpa5MHNqX4tT1O2eJEPwvqx+Y aTK4xeTtD72Sr7GTm5qOZnfrsNvAPFiwVJh3belrWPOo7cNk3gyPN6TmQbiQfNYhQle2 DeH7vjyJFcBkDvfE6CC8Jw185Jh/o8soyw8KDGhQFKE+d1Tp2J3OBH08x0juULGuVSOs pCsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e+rHfhQYTzQjupwUYqi6PKfQaJsLc87OPHgSOxOS2UE=; b=RXF548IStLpDtfLP9ZdCDj7etMIpxv7LdTpGd0zH6wdhgaUOwtlRB6bF/kVCcSGY24 kub8rLoPSx+Y8gU+7GQBLq2+D2rvw5Z/bqxp0J7BZWwtdvzaTaVB6WXYQmkk2JnGaLUA NaXXn9p2UJG6AlOzkVJkjvD/cM/XUZ7NR1fAqQ3/BrT65e+Mx4N0IFIl8zeJFQvISDHS H6yiA4g0b+WIBix4bSNk/R6c7QnW373oa/6Udgah5b2L66SLqyf4xqZQCpLwibv6UlLR SnCTGUWmJY+z3+1OU5+KlL+yftWhbdyy2Q5aNfJNPZOtXw8NR3gjzCr7+PiZ6KKblkNR A0hQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBKIMy3a0EklWeCT5eyfJzt+DL3CtmjcUiIY5eaydf265YTL//k nSlac15sAPpQ5Z1yx1HjL0Wgn2T+qg== X-Received: by 10.200.37.227 with SMTP id f32mr2413137qtf.221.1494363555992; Tue, 09 May 2017 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.165.132 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2017 13:58:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sergio Demian Lerner Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 17:58:35 -0300 Message-ID: To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11403598eba269054f1da0c7 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some real-world results about the current Segwit Discount X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 20:59:20 -0000 --001a11403598eba269054f1da0c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I agree with you Matt. I'm artificially limiting myself to changing the parameters of Segwit as it is.. This is motivated by the idea that a consensual HF in the current state would have greater chance of acceptance if it changes the minimum number of lines of code. On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Matt Corallo > wrote: > > at beast. > > Rawr. > --001a11403598eba269054f1da0c7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree with you Matt.=C2=A0
I'm artificially limi= ting myself to changing the parameters of Segwit as it is..=C2=A0

This is motivated by the idea that a consensual HF in the c= urrent state would have greater chance of acceptance if it changes the mini= mum number of lines of code.



On Tue, May 9, 2017 at= 5:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org> wrote:
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com> wrote= :
> at beast.

Rawr.

--001a11403598eba269054f1da0c7--