From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECA63DBB for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:52:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910286E0 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id v4so12533339ioj.5 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:52:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=V6unCLAdA5areb96ESSqFqWFIBJQGMGIqa17bhD5CZg=; b=WrmWZCgynN7Rz9sCGYA1IPiIdYUHOIIrqaBKpBd6W3DwlvgPZjXB0DKcjE000PghF7 IdOd0tfnTOj6QlFlYml92wle+bkwT4XkSZoCHdaWkXtniGEaKLNhdm3HxkADgY8TxLdV ujjQ5t4JdTjHFBf6Gfkygt6pxG1irSN+lBgNTQ8utxqMuMCLlUiFJzVK9yGeCtMd6XYo H0m6dfZR6EzWtJ3XTLWIW1L+SH9ufB/2i0/xMHSGaoyI40U37HjTX8ZvIbsCGe7VGwnr LguzcbAGrCGSvWMWdz5n0ijd01wUOYgSS/6JcBNIwbT8JT8Q51SExFCkMU8gklEYMcWT KIpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V6unCLAdA5areb96ESSqFqWFIBJQGMGIqa17bhD5CZg=; b=Fl99V96JyvrO0hanwAzEIrSNg4k9t6TYo9uNV12R18hAevYAOnofuXxQ1DzC5oz3KM dz7kZWIVFveslxeQ7oxRQjnl3AUBzQmMWbDx6gXyt5zcL/Awk2UzcNprceNJzyyk7Ui+ qKhCrYhTx0g5DoKBig0AfL4vAXQ9CwEkbIaHT98bddXFMhdQ8zuT3UrV/Nb8Mv4iEDw9 jRI9doqh7RMTCOO7JDQdz/LqGEl0Pob4DtcooO95zDT7w6fEc/78y4ltq0HZ+UlcaKLn ComI7ajMf7KZP57BaOA/m4QpkqQJY5KGoIRJOYUoJtzbqB8O/i2MTwJRJ/SvTc5wc6fB r9Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWf0XEwbVO8ukZMTic06WmUoqey79ls7IwnxC3lq8VRNNVFxwoY x8rrFokqe0UmNNc2DTh3f3zmcr7xlXADYlDb7fE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxT52bnuaIlZaN8iJ+Gn5RqPu4avK6GXSsSLK98wjCXdHcp4zBFipCQZyMhHhcnB+sq0l9WaxsFTEaPO2WtMlw= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:db48:: with SMTP id r8mr16805459iop.220.1554249147845; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:52:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ricardo Filipe Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:52:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: nathanw@tutanota.com, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:09:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Bitcoin Integrated Address Feature? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 23:52:29 -0000 I believe you are looking for HD wallets. Nathan Worsley via bitcoin-dev escreveu no dia ter=C3=A7a, 2/04/2019 =C3=A0(s) 18:06: > > To whom it may concern, > > I believe a missing feature in Bitcoin is the ability to have an "integra= ted address", where the address resolves into a Bitcoin address, and also a= transaction message or some other kind of identifier. > > By having this feature we could enhance the security of exchange cold-wal= let systems, by allowing them to easily receive all payments to a single ad= dress from an infinite number of customers. We would also greatly simplify = the process of setting up and managing exchange cold-wallet systems, becaus= e we would eliminate the "sweeping" step required to move multiple customer= deposits from a hot address into a single cold address. >