From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WqNZj-0000Zf-Am for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:14:27 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.179; envelope-from=alexy.kot.all@gmail.com; helo=mail-vc0-f179.google.com; Received: from mail-vc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WqNZd-0005eo-Jr for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:14:27 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id im17so2116193vcb.24 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:14:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.220.68.83 with SMTP id u19mr1474471vci.52.1401459256095; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:14:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: alexy.kot.all@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.181.71 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140523221726.GA30143@petertodd.org> <20140526163753.GA18693@petertodd.org> From: Alex Kotenko Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:13:36 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kOGX-wltVbnschSUIRHPN8i7xGU Message-ID: To: Robert McKay Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4149f8207a2b04fa9ea99b X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alexy.kot.all[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.3 HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD BODY: HTML font face is not a word -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WqNZd-0005eo-Jr Cc: Bitcoin Dev , Andreas Schildbach Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org is up again X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:14:27 -0000 --047d7b4149f8207a2b04fa9ea99b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hmm, you might be right, as queries dig @node.alexykot.me testnet-seed.alexykot.me =E2=80=8Band dig @node.alexykot.me -p 18353 testnet-seed.alexykot.me=E2=80=8B =E2=80=8Bare giving different authority sections. Hmm, but if I setup custom SOA record for it - it should work, right? What SOA name should it be actually, assuming that NS record for testnet-seed.alexykot.me is pointing at alexykot.me? Best regards, Alex Kotenko 2014-05-30 14:41 GMT+01:00 Robert McKay : > Hi Alex, > > I think the problem is with my suggestion to use bind forwarding.. > basically bind is stripping off the authorative answer bit in the reply.. > this causes the recursor to go into a loop chasing the authority server > which again returns a non-authoritve answer with itself as the authority > again. I'm not sure if this can be fixed without hacking the bind src, so > maybe it wasn't such a great suggestion in the first place. Basically I > think if bind was returning authorative answers it would work, but I can'= t > see any way to make that happen in the bind configuration. > > Rob > > > On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:19:05 +0100, Alex Kotenko wrote: > >> Hi Peter >> >> Ive setup DNS seeds myself a week ago, at testnet-seed.alexykot.me [6] >> and bitcoin-seed.alexykot.me [7], but there is a problem with DNS >> settings that we with Andreas couldnt sort out quickly. >> >> The problem itself is that I can reach my nameserver and get dnsseed >> response if I query it directly with >> dig @node.alexykot.me [8] testnet-seed.alexykot.me [9] >> >> dig @node.alexykot.me [10] bitcoin-seed.alexykot.me [11] >> >> =E2=80=8BBut when I try nslookup testnet-seed.alexykot.me [12]=E2=80=8B = - it >> fails. >> I guess the problem is in my DNS settings but I cant figure out what >> is it. >> >> =E2=80=8BS o could you share >> =E2=80=8Bhow you configured DNS >> =E2=80=8B for your seed >> =E2=80=8B to help me debug >> =E2=80=8Bmine >> ? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Alex Kotenko >> =E2=80=8B >> > --047d7b4149f8207a2b04fa9ea99b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hmm, you might be right, as quer= ies=C2=A0
dig @node.alexykot.me=C2=A0testnet-seed.alexykot.me
=E2=80=8Band=C2= =A0
dig @node.alexykot.me=C2=A0-= p 18353=C2=A0testnet-see= d.alexykot.me=E2=80=8B

=E2=80=8Bare= giving different authority sections.

Hmm, but if I setup custom SOA record f= or it - it should work, right?=C2=A0
What SOA name should it be actually, assuming that NS record for testnet-seed.alexykot.me is pointing = at alexykot.me?


Best regards,=C2=A0
Alex Kotenko


2014-05-30 14:41 GMT+01:00 Robert McKay = <robert@mckay.com>:
Hi Alex,

I think the problem is with my suggestion to use bind forwarding.. basicall= y bind is stripping off the authorative answer bit in the reply.. this caus= es the recursor to go into a loop chasing the authority server which again = returns a non-authoritve answer with itself as the authority again. I'm= not sure if this can be fixed without hacking the bind src, so maybe it wa= sn't such a great suggestion in the first place. Basically I think if b= ind was returning authorative answers it would work, but I can't see an= y way to make that happen in the bind configuration.

Rob


On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:19:05 +0100, Alex Kotenko wrote:
Hi Peter

Ive setup DNS seeds myself a week ago, at testnet-seed.alexykot.me [6]
and bitcoin-s= eed.alexykot.me [7], but there is a problem with DNS
settings that we with Andreas couldnt sort out quickly.

The problem itself is that I can reach my nameserver and get dnsseed
response if I query it directly with
=C2=A0dig @node.alexy= kot.me [8] testnet-seed.alexykot.me [9]

=C2=A0dig @node.alexy= kot.me [10] bitcoin-seed.alexykot.me [11]

=E2=80=8BBut when I try nslookup testnet-seed.alexykot.me [12]=E2=80=8B - it
fails.=C2=A0
I guess the problem is in my DNS settings but I cant figure out what
is it.

=E2=80=8BS o could you share
=E2=80=8Bhow you configured=C2=A0DNS
=C2=A0=E2=80=8B for your seed
=E2=80=8B to help me debug
=C2=A0=E2=80=8Bmine
?=C2=A0

Best regards,=C2=A0

Alex Kotenko
=E2=80=8B
--047d7b4149f8207a2b04fa9ea99b--