From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDF798D for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:40:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com (mail-yw0-f171.google.com [209.85.161.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ADF212F for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z8so56602143ywa.1 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:40:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ledger-fr.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Rp4HVJT0SyAleUP3JJJAAh/YMiyE1HRyDY/JONs5em4=; b=dw5rIpKYAnEZg3siJrmUYe+FwuJgyOKrrrMnscHopndGTkuG95Uih8cCRj24P7H18I YSa4Z2Bwo5Z0b946+PiyLl+wabHtUSbjJBGnQwAWTIpEYsc5gMD+59hs0qoBshFf+ekj c0SYPcqIhytM5ymMQ0ZY8qIQTbSl/dwdDDddoqHSrBBTsuhtvduZfE9zxeirCclbvyJz V2hZR6g7HLxBsn6DwmsoUXVO8rWh2r+giHpSUIt/eGtG5iP3YKK1cEXaAyLhTpgymdmo fW/f2vlgXSDO9ZECiSqJpgrsT4qe2TzlmNVhBNZsp/5k6Xu1SKXHX6vmHhzq0LD36jHv 4vhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Rp4HVJT0SyAleUP3JJJAAh/YMiyE1HRyDY/JONs5em4=; b=d7r8deqDY2kbCY5yjjsWnzp9xLCtKmuZNs5QcZsSGnXHswNW+o3lBhzhJ9o1xw0As5 WXi/aKhwFVy7IPU1iDp96Z4PHdTP69AnpAXKp4ZhaLw1E0R2TPK0wKoH85szHZC1Yb9X aX+WMUQ3kva23+FyoqvL7RIAWpwE6a1wbQ476PGzas7qzD3fSf+aNDmHWsliWqsbz3NL TWpqcK38Ry3t8v03gQitxzqXWWQy3f/G1kecXl0quVy42gl+ASJPzgjYyJZL6xErG1Jg LcQGG9SraN/Ob5gbgvm/hR53Td1fDXzzHk/++jzsnV/BOFBS+zARKAuxuofjgyzziwCB Nftg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutJZpfUyrfWyNkY9vVOh6PcpoN/oUWd7B39Py42vXVevV55SNhx+DjBBE1KXSdqErIaaByn6jWqPpAYHg== X-Received: by 10.129.154.68 with SMTP id r65mr29327041ywg.119.1471419658528; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:40:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.157.73 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:40:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57B4113E.4010502@jonasschnelli.ch> References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch> <9c8dd0e5-e333-90c8-965f-10fb29d875a5@thomaskerin.io> <57B4113E.4010502@jonasschnelli.ch> From: Nicolas Bacca Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:40:58 +0200 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0bb2fa101b14053a3f96a9 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:41:00 -0000 --94eb2c0bb2fa101b14053a3f96a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Conclusion: > =========== > * Non of the points convinced me that there is a better alternative to > the proposed URI scheme interaction (please tell me if I'm stubborn). > I'd also agree with this - and it's convenient to test against simulators / mocks. -- Nicolas Bacca | CTO, Ledger --94eb2c0bb2fa101b14053a3f96a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

Conclusion:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
* Non of the points convinced me that there is a better alternative to
the proposed URI scheme interaction (please tell me if I'm stubborn).

I'd also agree with this - and it= 9;s convenient to test against simulators / mocks.

--=C2=A0
Nicolas Bacca | CTO,= Ledger


--94eb2c0bb2fa101b14053a3f96a9--