public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl-Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
To: Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPable-idea: Consistent and better definition of the term 'address'
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:00:51 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALJw2w6FeQDpiFZ9+j-tmho_HMFCyi-0wLrGqze9jD5iSLfuVw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20824fa5-e3fa-8d4e-1678-4c2048b49b6b@emilengler.com>

I've proposed bitcoin invoice for awhile now. See
https://twitter.com/kallewoof/status/1165841566105079808

I like bitcoin invoice address into bitcoin address as proposed by Chris.


On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:45 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> * Sorry if this mail was sent multiple times, my E-Mail client went crazy *
>
> Thanks for all your feedback.
> I came to the decision to write a BIP for this, even if it might not be
> implemented by many wallets, a standardization is never wrong and this
> would be the first step in the correct direction for better on-chain
> privacy.
>
> However currently we still need a good term for the 'address' replacement.
>
> The current suggestions are:
> * Invoice ID
> * Payment Token
> * Bitcoin invoice (address)
> * Bitcoin invoice (path)
>
> Because of the LN term invoice I really like the term 'Bitcoin Invoice'
> by Chris Belcher.
>
> So how do find a consensus about these terms?
>
> Greetings
> Emil Engler
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-11  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-05 21:57 [bitcoin-dev] BIPable-idea: Consistent and better definition of the term 'address' Emil Engler
2019-10-06 11:32 ` Luke Dashjr
2019-10-06 16:06   ` Emil Engler
2019-10-09 19:32 ` Chris Belcher
2019-10-10 15:05   ` Emil Engler
2019-10-11  1:13     ` Lloyd Fournier
2019-10-11  2:00     ` Karl-Johan Alm [this message]
2019-10-11  4:22       ` Ariel Lorenzo-Luaces
2019-10-11 21:03         ` Emil Engler
2019-10-17 13:23           ` Marco Falke
2019-10-17 19:28             ` Emil Engler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALJw2w6FeQDpiFZ9+j-tmho_HMFCyi-0wLrGqze9jD5iSLfuVw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox