From: Karl Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
To: Jim Posen <jim.posen@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] {sign|verify}message replacement
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:25:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALJw2w7LAUB+7FpLSGz=+pL7y_t5sy0yGuhYML7yJjuKc8Uw_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADZtCSiSCDb1dzLCgr24jCNzzmcfsXuPyNVh+YJJ6rNqdsQh2Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Jim Posen <jim.posen@gmail.com> wrote:
> How are scripts with OP_CLTV and OP_CSV handled by verifiers? Do they always
> succeed? Or should an nLockTime and nSequence also be included in the proof
> in a way that can be parsed out and displayed to verifiers?
Good question.. Since you don't really have the input(s), I think it's
fine to always assume sufficient time/height on CLTV/CSV checks.
> I assume any signatures in the scriptSig/witness data would have no sighash
> type?
I think it would just use the default (SIGHASH_ALL?) for simplicity.
Is there a good reason to tweak it?
-Kalle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 8:09 [bitcoin-dev] {sign|verify}message replacement Karl Johan Alm
2018-03-14 9:46 ` Kalle Rosenbaum
2018-03-14 16:12 ` Anthony Towns
2018-03-15 3:01 ` Karl Johan Alm
2018-03-15 6:43 ` Jim Posen
2018-03-15 7:25 ` Karl Johan Alm [this message]
2018-03-15 20:53 ` Jim Posen
2018-03-14 12:36 ` Luke Dashjr
2018-03-15 7:36 ` Karl Johan Alm
2018-03-15 14:14 ` Luke Dashjr
2018-03-16 0:38 ` Karl Johan Alm
2018-03-16 1:59 ` Greg Sanders
2018-03-16 2:04 ` Karl Johan Alm
2018-03-15 10:15 ` Damian Williamson
2018-03-26 8:53 ` Pieter Wuille
2018-03-27 8:09 ` Karl Johan Alm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALJw2w7LAUB+7FpLSGz=+pL7y_t5sy0yGuhYML7yJjuKc8Uw_w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jim.posen@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox