From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14679C0001 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 11:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E218940134 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 11:00:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id seJ1T8xqq281 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 11:00:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2758D4010C for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 11:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id v6so17220138ljj.5 for ; Sun, 09 May 2021 03:59:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=32XaUg490l3+o4Hrg7zPGTmZupSHZ/soDnBLQ+FeqQ0=; b=PiICTe98zkBVLukZbyJijHyOuGmar75fyfm/QHU/usaS2Ds0h64vDIpLT5n/VomrOY LS5b3g6Unkuykbi1OAZjAb6EJLaqiNIdhnv3KIiR5Cgg7ncJrtTIwU/yTWkpzqn8D1mM ZCNADXeVfe2rEYb4c3MGx1oySZByCTKExypZO0zKmj6GP01vOoVEDqfU2IwXKUoh7iFD 3+LC1PeRxrsGR2XqkWsW+yVVOdckiU2L6/8MLEp++W5P1ByPN/jpXB2FfO68O0irRoGG uwsh9HHnbp1u+OTIGYfGiU6sRY0/U84l+u5McM4RUSkFLlRzs3VVGvAIm78C5cfv+eq8 cusw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=32XaUg490l3+o4Hrg7zPGTmZupSHZ/soDnBLQ+FeqQ0=; b=cvXdLnFlSw5VGh1plTofkgm8c8AsDGdp19ndfKDud9XZmP5AnnjtmSDKHUgDl3mfFj Lzo7XDG7YVRelP+rDnHUJgcrfSvsCGPdHoXZmqMtF4Uo5AWQFoRdEaxeX8WK9Aa9zFmM z0ARl7C+TcWd+qa2/1TnehkloRmaiXrUXsxCWtfRRjLpjMehrDILy17dxNzLxmU+WqQ4 xBcOj8y0LeXysxyz3l7MW6EOkdG24vNyrtp0fRKvx5YQEoL8Vli24YHG+lJrf6/VuVA1 2S1WqhjviahQhnvp8A1E/fHL4APnuPC0cxA3oZ1wmTDqtasZTlW+m4sMkuOjek+VbEIA Zciw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iBDONS2e6sibDetzsSMoLr/p1MjQAAC6otqbBMCf96FjXL/5m QHTWTXO3DMOvhb41WUALDSrSFs3yZACMZqyTNo0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKQ6UZ1l5cCaZtySvAoADTlAYO7QoyXN2+YIXGJ9flsJxqqONP6HzuBxQXmGXRldD6bOlFDzr1p0sBe7nz0eo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8557:: with SMTP id u23mr15874791ljj.221.1620557998169; Sun, 09 May 2021 03:59:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6do5xN2g5LPnFeM55iJ-4C4MyXOu_KeXxy68Xt4dJQMhi3LJ8ZrLICmEUlh8JGfDmsDG12m1JDAh0e0huwK_MlyKpdfn22ru3zsm7lYLfBo=@protonmail.com> <6C68BF06-522B-41D3-BF3A-17D900C51BD1@voskuil.org> In-Reply-To: From: Karl Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 06:59:46 -0400 Message-ID: To: R E Broadley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1a4df05c1e38f11" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 09 May 2021 19:53:08 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Opinion on proof of stake in future X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 11:00:01 -0000 --000000000000d1a4df05c1e38f11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, May 9, 2021, 6:21 AM R E Broadley < rebroad+linuxfoundation.org@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 15:36, Karl via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > Bitcoin would get better mainstream public reputation if the block > reward were reduced to reduce mining. This would quickly and easily reduce > energy expenditure. > > You're in luck then, as the block reward is being reduced by 50%, every 4 > years. > I'm aware of that and it is why I mentioned "block reward termination" in the next paragraph... did you receive the rest of my message? Or why do you say this? > --000000000000d1a4df05c1e38f11 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, May 9, 2021, 6:21 AM R E Broadley <rebroad+linuxfoundation.org@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 15:36, Karl via bit= coin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org= > wrote:
> Bitcoin would get better mainstream public reputation if the block rew= ard were reduced to reduce mining.=C2=A0 This would quickly and easily redu= ce energy expenditure.

You're in luck then, as the block reward is being reduced by 50%, every= 4 years.

I'm aware of that and it is why I mentioned "block rewar= d termination" in the next paragraph... did you receive the rest of my= message?=C2=A0 Or why do you say this?
--000000000000d1a4df05c1e38f11--