I'll reiterate my opinion expressed during the meeting. If this proposal to extend the bip editorship membership doesn't satisfy parties involved or anyone in the community, I'm strongly opposed to have the matter sliced by admins of the Bitcoin github org. I believe that defect or uncertainty in the BIP Process shouldn't be solved by GH janitorial roles and I think their roles don't bestow to intervene in case of loopholes. Further, you have far more contributors involved in the BIP Process rather than only Bitcoin Core ones. FWIW, such precedent merits would be quite similar to lobby directly GH staff...
Unless we harm Bitcoin users by not acting, I think we should always be respectful of procedural forms. And in the lack of such forms, stay patient until a solution satisfy everyone.
I would recommend the BIP editorship, once extended or not, to move in its own repository in the future.
Cheers,
Antoine