From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SOvFk-000852-9O for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:23:16 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=etotheipi@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SOvFj-0000Lv-3u for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:23:16 +0000 Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so995424wgb.10 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:23:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.40 with SMTP id y8mr6848241wiw.15.1335810188892; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.83.103 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:23:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:23:08 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alan Reiner To: Amir Taaki Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c80b4cbd9cc04bee98b7c X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (etotheipi[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1SOvFj-0000Lv-3u Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:23:16 -0000 --f46d043c80b4cbd9cc04bee98b7c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, looks good! I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :) A couple comments: I don't think the entries for "wallet security" and "backups" accurately describe Armory. Wallet Security should say "Encrypt/Offline" or something to to that effect -- after all, offline wallets are the holy grail feature of the Armory. And backups should say something like "One-time Printable" if it fits within the box. Otherwise, I really like the layout and design. Although despite the fact I enjoy being first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt should still go first. It is the "reference" client, and I think it's relevant that it is the "de-facto" client for the majority of users, and the one with the most quality control and stability. -Alan On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki wrote: > Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/34 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --f46d043c80b4cbd9cc04bee98b7c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey, looks good! =A0I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)
<= br>
A couple comments: =A0I don't think the entries for "= ;wallet security" and "backups" accurately describe Armory. = =A0Wallet Security should say "Encrypt/Offline" or something to t= o that effect -- after all, offline wallets are the holy grail feature of t= he Armory. =A0And backups should say something like "One-time Printabl= e" if it fits within the box. =A0

Otherwise, I really like the layout and design. =A0Alth= ough despite the fact I enjoy being first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt s= hould still go first. =A0It is the "reference" client, and I thin= k it's relevant that it is the "de-facto" client for the majo= rity of users, and the one with the most quality control and stability.

-Alan


On M= on, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> = wrote:
Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bit= coin.org/pull/34

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122= 263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

--f46d043c80b4cbd9cc04bee98b7c--