Actually I was looking at a screenshot someone sent me because I couldn't seem to access it even after changing the hosts file (I assumed it was recent, but I guess not).  It just looked like the regular Bitcoin page (despite doing a ping on the command line and seeing the expected IP).  Was there a specific link to click on?    Am I blind?

Is there a process we should use to submit how we think our program should be represented on the clients page?  

-Alan


On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:
Are we looking at the same list? Because here is the order I added: Bitcoin-Qt, Armory, Electrum and MultiBit. Maybe try CTRL-F5 to force a refresh of your browser.

Also about the descriptions: yeah I know. I think it's better to put this up first and then have everyone submit their own descriptions and screenshots. Otherwise it'll be a nightmare to coordinate until everything is perfect. I did message you on IRC today but maybe you were offline.

I didn't copy paste the Armory description from the website because it really sounds too spammy like a sales pitch. Here I was trying to give an even handed balanced overview of all the clients. For each client I was trying to empaphise a 'theme'. Bitcoin-Qt is stability. Armory is advanced. Electrum is convenient. MultiBit is ease of use.

________________________________
From: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page


Hey, looks good!  I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)

A couple comments:  I don't think the entries for "wallet security" and "backups" accurately describe Armory.  Wallet Security should say "Encrypt/Offline" or something to to that effect -- after all, offline wallets are the holy grail feature of the Armory.  And backups should say something like "One-time Printable" if it fits within the box.  

Otherwise, I really like the layout and design.  Although despite the fact I enjoy being first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt should still go first.  It is the "reference" client, and I think it's relevant that it is the "de-facto" client for the majority of users, and the one with the most quality control and stability.

-Alan



On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:

Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/34
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Live Security Virtual Conference
>Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>_______________________________________________
>Bitcoin-development mailing list
>Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development