From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45075721 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 02:03:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE37F23F for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 02:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l18so111201634oig.2 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 19:03:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZspVDNJPG6u93J7Crvy2uoxHEiVBDB/77gh/Sw188OM=; b=Ls//InKIcNJj8S/s/+RgcPCxj4imlAUeZ95smE5tdiNzWll3upQmK3YdckkFeBL3Er 3TYmNSwQCqQ1qgmI5CDxy/Ju5vD0JWiOKJ7zHvTgaiDjdPYCk/D9iRhHMw8xgISNWsle uzy1RbyOwT1sC/bQpE4wmpuA37y75nbuwpclA5U83VLzhNBFRvcxYD1RI+rLYIdlQDB2 FNxCiNIfib3Dysg2ReZnPVxKdcgaq+HHY/ILmLxtoKVERtLTNilPLnhvRk+OPy7kuVY4 gMyAcivPCYqlAY1+3Fi+KrLZzHgQpwToH3gaOzeo1U4dYcdrPvy0ep2hpkaiYqYTscX9 BhDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZspVDNJPG6u93J7Crvy2uoxHEiVBDB/77gh/Sw188OM=; b=CXN5yjDMgE7xpc6sFCkE0OYkr4qzDW/SPFY6mxEWQlEFoWmlJ+1zDjhc/45DUJebFp H5deFcx8tcjN/zmNviWl6AHhm+bOgoZaVwfQQWlyMMF/r6ouHe/MrYMD3J3QlmDvMDQQ H1LxWCfYYdj71lPLdkbOuX8r5yVgygiTF67BCnhZy8t0C6OnjNmSGEMei5VJ6Pk7j5D7 q25RzjbP/ZXpkizreDPNG7y7C+un7YubfX+2wQOvkSf94nH2BN1T/BHmvUVFNEtoWbk7 Stw7E2dhN4/CU7WWP9n/dqYMahODcSBoYIgokrTS5y5MTjXr1GrOCX6T5uCtVCuYStk2 MVkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcADy5xtvrIBBwYout5rIOh85sN/nqsnKFYL/p6UwsJ+CH12kd8k BeVr4EbgBZ1I9szx6eSIiqekveXbdQ== X-Received: by 10.157.23.133 with SMTP id j5mr5649873otj.37.1496455428252; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 19:03:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.16.67 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.16.67 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:03:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1CF1FD5D-8D29-4783-823F-B3F588D5C5CE@mattcorallo.com> From: Oliver Petruzel Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 22:03:47 -0400 Message-ID: To: Erik Aronesty Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c09cc323928b2055104ae12" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 03:55:01 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For Comments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 02:03:49 -0000 --94eb2c09cc323928b2055104ae12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" >>>Take a quick look at the COOP proposal...it gets us to 4mb blocks in 4 years....gradually, no massive fee swings.<<< How is that captured in the COOP BIP? I can see Luke's 2MB cap referenced in the BIP, but I don't see anything in the text that would indicate a gradual increase of any sort. As someone who has previously written a BIP draft to accomplish a gradual increase with SegWit, I'd be very interested in seeing what approach they've chosen. Ollie --94eb2c09cc323928b2055104ae12 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>Take a quick look at the COOP = proposal...it gets us to 4mb blocks in 4 years....gradually, no massive fee= swings.<<<

How is that captured in t= he COOP BIP? I can see Luke's 2MB cap referenced in the BIP, but I don&= #39;t see anything in the text that would indicate a gradual increase of an= y sort.

As someone who has previously written a BIP d= raft to accomplish a gradual increase with SegWit, I'd be very interest= ed in seeing what approach they've chosen.

Ollie
--94eb2c09cc323928b2055104ae12--