From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YHh3z-00039P-Vs for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 23:02:52 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.192.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.192.50; envelope-from=martin.habovstiak@gmail.com; helo=mail-qg0-f50.google.com; Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com ([209.85.192.50]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YHh3z-00016u-67 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 23:02:51 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f51so43060316qge.9 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:02:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.104.229 with SMTP id a92mr25644981qgf.78.1422745365777; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:02:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.19.18 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:02:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1422667849.25602.6.camel@TARDIS> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 01:02:45 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Habov=C5=A1tiak?= To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (martin.habovstiak[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YHh3z-00016u-67 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature payments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 23:02:52 -0000 I didn't consider that, thank you for feedback! I will try to find some time for implementing it. I'll write again then. 2015-01-31 23:50 GMT+02:00 Gavin Andresen : > I agree- standards should be descriptive ("here is how this thing I did > works") and NOT proscriptive ("here's what I think will work, lets all try > to do it this way."). > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: >>> >>> I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive >>> feedback from community. >> >> >> IMO it's better to pair a protocol spec with an implementation. > > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen