From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D036414A0 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:28:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E391D2 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oigm66 with SMTP id m66so56831591oig.0 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:28:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=8/uLGMsPU0Kgi8Ky7kxWf30+JiEt35LGtj6O6BtOV8g=; b=YDs8WDTuNQ7lYC5cMSPrPSUCL1+RXPIdqQ7/yG3gPZVimajoNg0Af2PQkih165TLvv +MyT1DWTxOM9q+cgjObosL+2x/sHg719vUz1AJqAJWjNV4IgK1scRIEjVmIAcUZ+BpsB xL6bfPoyZcuNShIrk70hSA8ePklzLnzFmoCaa+zNOlM1a6K/2RzpoSGQo/JMxyuoYp+j d88Pq0Yv3oFxR8Ah1kwmUW5L/OxzDCylWH8X19t6VLXBosiZXvU4p6DDe92elEml5izI foOglbwDRPh9tE0K+2jY7NAVs/g1jZXJ1YRqSQnF1ElKHGrB3ej0aQzc9J4Bq9y4lQOM 0Qfw== X-Received: by 10.202.215.8 with SMTP id o8mr12591590oig.47.1441020523483; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:28:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.188.193 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:28:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55E2FB70.5070805@sky-ip.org> References: <55DFC0C6.80607@riseup.net> <55E2FB70.5070805@sky-ip.org> From: prabhat Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:58:23 +0530 Message-ID: To: s7r@sky-ip.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPS proposal for implementing AML-KYC in bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:28:48 -0000 --001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for nice decentralized discussion. This wasn't and isn't a parody. Mining is insecure (for society) and security is passive. All the raised points are proven by esteemed members themselves. Closing from my side. Thanks, God Bless, Bye Prabhat Kumar Singh On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:17 PM, s7r wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > 2^256 x _NO_ > > On 8/28/2015 5:00 AM, odinn via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > No. > > > > On 08/27/2015 01:10 AM, prabhat via bitcoin-dev wrote: > >> Hi, > > > >> I am proposing to create a AML-KYC module to control the network > >> and also qualify use cases in OFAC compliant way. Here is the > >> attached doc. > > > >> Please provide your feedback and suggestions. > > > >> Best, Prabhat Kumar Singh > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV4vtvAAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRLhgIANLoG2/NNuc+sAMZnSojWQf7 > UxJeOLFE7XXOCwDeUPfbgJ6JxYMTQwqT/mOAAPkHoAwm+k7SHUy+MuxTGnlui4n7 > hKtRPdZ1ibYeBLV3CBQb9PEN2Ma7Djjh2LtBcbueF19w3j95NOSnTl9P3jOfc8kW > x2rAEoZFJeJUOE/prbedrzQ8wSHm9ekt4BXiDnUaR3Xvvp/NuVZ9+eWJT+lWS4fR > 16zFQZPMYP6o2evnhluAJCTvP0q0Imz6d4I0Mryi2hLDX964sLpxP0tK+ASbtzwV > CknfKeSjwpZ116MMDSfgnya17AYc0o6RWl6XjAgciPAMJFQnhhSKzLNV9898AT0= > =It5v > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > --001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for nice decentralized discussion.
This wasn= 9;t and isn't a parody.
Mining is insecure (for society) and = security is passive.=C2=A0
All the raised points are proven by es= teemed members themselves.

Closing from my side.
Thanks,
God Bless,
Bye

Prab= hat Kumar Singh


On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:17 PM, s7r <s7r@sky-= ip.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN P= GP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

2^256 x _NO_

On 8/28/2015 5:00 AM, odinn via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> No.
>
> On 08/27/2015 01:10 AM, prabhat via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> I am proposing to create a AML-KYC module to control the network >> and also qualify use cases in OFAC compliant way. Here is the
>> attached doc.
>
>> Please provide your feedback and suggestions.
>
>> Best, Prabhat Kumar Singh
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV4vtvAAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRLhgIANLoG2/NNuc+sAMZnSojWQf7
UxJeOLFE7XXOCwDeUPfbgJ6JxYMTQwqT/mOAAPkHoAwm+k7SHUy+MuxTGnlui4n7
hKtRPdZ1ibYeBLV3CBQb9PEN2Ma7Djjh2LtBcbueF19w3j95NOSnTl9P3jOfc8kW
x2rAEoZFJeJUOE/prbedrzQ8wSHm9ekt4BXiDnUaR3Xvvp/NuVZ9+eWJT+lWS4fR
16zFQZPMYP6o2evnhluAJCTvP0q0Imz6d4I0Mryi2hLDX964sLpxP0tK+ASbtzwV
CknfKeSjwpZ116MMDSfgnya17AYc0o6RWl6XjAgciPAMJFQnhhSKzLNV9898AT0=3D
=3DIt5v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83--