From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Vlm1J-0003zr-E0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:47:37 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.47; envelope-from=decker.christian@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Vlm1I-00037w-5r for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:47:37 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k1so8289689oag.34 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:47:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.60.51.196 with SMTP id m4mr35183418oeo.1.1385585250764; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:47:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.9.40 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:46:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52930FA3.3070802@ceptacle.com> From: Christian Decker Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:46:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: doubleclick.net] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (decker.christian[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Vlm1I-00037w-5r Cc: Bitcoin Development , Michael Gronager Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Network propagation speeds X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:47:37 -0000 Damn, that happens if I do the overview as an afterthought. Fixed :-) Real time (last 24 hours, last week, last month) are in the pipeline, just need to find the time to implement access to the collector from the webpage. -- Christian Decker On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > Hey Christian, > > Could you sort the snapshots by date? At the moment they're kind of in a > random order. > > Sometimes I wish we had real-time stats too but this is a great start. > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Christian Decker > wrote: >> >> Thanks Mike for the Tip :-) >> >> I will definitely extend the calculations to include a size-normalized >> version. As for transaction propagations, being much smaller the >> measurements tend to be much noisier, but given enough samples we >> might be able to reconstruct some of the system parameters. >> >> Good idea to attempt to correlate propagation speed and number of >> inputs/outputs, might be interesting to see whether processing at the >> nodes has an influence. >> >> Regards, >> Chris >> -- >> Christian Decker >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Michael Gronager >> wrote: >> > Hi Christian, >> > >> > Cool - thanks for posting - agree, that it would be nice to normalize >> > the results with block size - so divide by size and: >> > 1. see if there is a correlation (we all presume there still is) >> > 2. plot the delay graph as e.g. normalized to the averaged blocksize or >> > lets define a "standard block size" of 200kb or what ever so we can >> > compare the plot btw days. >> > >> > Also, does the correlation of propagation times hold for transaction >> > sizes as well (would be ice to find the logical t0 and the constant - I >> > guess the interesting measure is not kb but signatures, so number of >> > inputs - some correlation with size though). >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Michael >> > >> > On 24/11/13, 17:37 , Christian Decker wrote: >> >> Sure thing, I'm looking for a good way to publish these measurements, >> >> but I haven't found a good option yet. They are rather large in size, >> >> so I'd rather not serve them along with the website as it hasn't got >> >> the capacity. Any suggestions? If the demand is not huge I could >> >> provide them on a per user basis. >> >> -- >> >> Christian Decker >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Gregory Maxwell >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Christian Decker >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> Since this came up again during the discussion of the Cornell paper I >> >>>> thought I'd dig up my measurement code from the Information >> >>>> Propagation paper and automate it as much as possible. >> >>> >> >>> Could you publish the block ids and timestamp sets for each block? >> >>> >> >>> It would be useful in correlating propagation information against >> >>> block characteristics. >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription >> >> Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech >> >> innovation. >> >> Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and >> >> game-changing >> >> conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up >> >> now. >> >> >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription >> > Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. >> > Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and >> > game-changing >> > conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up >> > now. >> > >> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Bitcoin-development mailing list >> > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription >> Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. >> Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing >> conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up >> now. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > >