From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z14sQ-0007pL-F3 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:34:30 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.171; envelope-from=pindar.wong@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f171.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z14sP-0002m1-3N for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:34:30 +0000 Received: by wigg3 with SMTP id g3so3361224wig.1 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:34:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.238.193 with SMTP id vm1mr11769045wjc.57.1433561663058; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.156.226 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:34:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 11:34:22 +0800 Message-ID: From: Pindar Wong To: gabe appleton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493cecb0b84c0517d115c7 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (pindar.wong[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z14sP-0002m1-3N Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:34:30 -0000 --089e01493cecb0b84c0517d115c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Gabe, Did you ever get an answer to this? I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc. I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb blocks... but hey that's just me. p. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton wrote: > I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll > happily get a framework started. > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman wrote: > >> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails >> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various >> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful. >> >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton >> wrote: >> >>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could >>> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if >>> the page gets approval. >>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate >>>> drives me nuts. >>>> >>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: >>>> >>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will >>>> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other >>>> smarter people have said over and over before, you're >>>> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. >>>> >>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is >>>> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. >>>> >>>> Mats >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>> >>> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --089e01493cecb0b84c0517d115c7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gabe,

Did you ever get an answer to= this?

I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with som= e work on this and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure= I understand the nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things = (or not) etc.

I would have thought that there would be a = testnet4 by now using 8mb blocks... but hey that's just me.

p.




On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <gap= pleto97@gmail.com> wrote:
<= div dir=3D"ltr">I don't have permission to create a page. If someone el= se does, I'll happily get a framework started.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
I second= this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails generated e= very day from the block size debate. A summary of the various positions and= arguments would be extremely helpful.=C2=A0

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM,= gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com> wrote:

Also, can we try to get a wiki page fo= r the debate? That way we could condense the information as much as possibl= e. I'll be willing to assist if the page gets approval.

On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson&quo= t; <mats@henricso= n.se> wrote:
= Hi!

My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
drives me nuts.

I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:

1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
=C2=A0 =C2=A0take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
=C2=A0 =C2=A0smarter people have said over and over before, you're
=C2=A0 =C2=A0wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.

2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
=C2=A0 =C2=A0just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.

Mats

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment




-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment


--089e01493cecb0b84c0517d115c7--