From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C510273 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:43:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68495118 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so8336434wiw.0 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dJWoB8oQSNUzAn/VurG1TdFtbLNOIPH0JzW37zaLPII=; b=ThrOGRqX250CJiX5K51+kEiJZXmy5WdGAKxq5c81ThCQz8i+cgwqiVYIw5hnSgVlgw h7a0U9hfmzMtrknDm1WuYyc860l6d1hqXsc8YEcgA9N1NDhCDDyE82du9pTGiIlg/c+5 nWTIBYmayyQWiRlglbdqD0MFztOIV15YVC8lGr/s0f9325gN6yrYB40eFI0f4ZVf+kiT 5HNL6cSxwFhWg3REJQvqTyoUTzqjCeee1Pug833YVl6vq9bFBovebwJcDwDLuYcobxgi uPSDOjhl/naUBhoNib5vw+iVG9sTVvn9sC3reCQZsdj9CIugw2bhzKpMUCTfIwmQXs9Q KnmQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.13.1 with SMTP id eu1mr11935020wjd.131.1435214599730; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.2.237 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:43:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150617035959.GB23826@muck> References: <20150616133305.GA30988@muck> <20150617035959.GB23826@muck> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:43:19 +0800 Message-ID: From: Pindar Wong To: Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd9131a64bbad051951f0fa X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Constance Choi , Bitcoin Dev , Primavera De Filippi , bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:43:24 -0000 --047d7bd9131a64bbad051951f0fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:55:13PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrote: > > > Agreed. Pieter Wuille's recent work is a great example of the kind of > > > science-driven investigations that need to be done - and haven't been > > > done very much - to get us some hard data to make decisions on. > > > > > > > Thank you very much Peter for pointing this out! That is very kind of > you. > > > > It would be great to work with Constance Choi, Primavera De Filippi, your > > goodself and others to make this happen. > > Great! They're excited to see this happen. I'm in London right now > actually for the conference they were holding this week; the blocksize > issue was being discussed a fair bit there among attendees. (notably, > with rather different views than seen on reddit!) > > > As you may know, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority considers bitcoin a > > virtual 'commodity' and not a currency per se. > > Yup, though keep in mind the regulatory question is more than just how > your local jurisdiction views Bitcoin, but rather how your customers' > jurisdictions view Bitcoin. > > Of course, when I say "customers" above, I mean the entire Bitcoin > community that is ultimately buying the new coins produced by miners and > paying fees to them! > I'm sorry for the distraction with the mailing list problems. Taking an ecosystem view, the miners are important, so are all the other participants who rely on it and invest time, effort and energy to make Bitcoin work and work well. I am in contact with Primavera and it would appear that the Cyberport is available for use on October 14 and 15 (Wed/Thursday). Last November, this was where the Global Bitcoin Summit (Hong Kong) was hosted with the participation of many of China's leading Bitcoin-related companies. There is a meeting now in Shanghai. It would be an honour to host a more technical meeting to discuss BIP100, 101 et al. should be interest to do so. p. > > -- > 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > 0000000000000000127ab1d576dc851f374424f1269c4700ccaba2c42d97e778 > --047d7bd9131a64bbad051951f0fa Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Peter Todd <pete@peter= todd.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:55:13PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrot= e:
> > Agreed. Pieter Wuille's recent work is a great example of the= kind of
> > science-driven investigations that need to be done - and haven= 9;t been
> > done very much - to get us some hard data to make decisions on. > >
>
> Thank you very much Peter for pointing this out! That is very kind of = you.
>
> It would be great to work with Constance Choi, Primavera De Filippi, y= our
> goodself and others to make this happen.

Great! They're excited to see this happen. I'm in London rig= ht now
actually for the conference they were holding this week; the blocksize
issue was being discussed a fair bit there among attendees. (notably,
with rather different views than seen on reddit!)

> As you may know, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority considers bitcoin a<= br> > virtual 'commodity' and not a currency per se.

Yup, though keep in mind the regulatory question is more than just h= ow
your local jurisdiction views Bitcoin, but rather how your customers' jurisdictions view Bitcoin.

Of course, when I say "customers" above, I mean the entire Bitcoi= n
community that is ultimately buying the new coins produced by miners and paying fees to them!

I'm sorry for = the distraction with the mailing list problems.

Taking an= ecosystem view, the miners are important, so are all the other participant= s who rely on it and=C2=A0 invest time, effort and energy to make Bitcoin w= ork and work well.

I am in contact with Primavera and it= would appear that the Cyberport is available for use on October 14 and 15 = (Wed/Thursday).

Last November, this was where the Global Bitcoin Summit (Hong Kong) was h= osted with the participation of many of China's leading Bitcoin-related= companies. There is a meeting now in Shanghai.

It woul= d be an honour to host a more technical meeting to discuss BIP100, 101 et a= l. should be interest to do so.=C2=A0

p.
=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000127ab1d576dc851f374424f1269c4700ccaba2c42d97e778

--047d7bd9131a64bbad051951f0fa--