From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z17gU-0005pX-1c for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:34:22 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.170; envelope-from=pindar.wong@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f170.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z17gR-0007PQ-0A for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:34:22 +0000 Received: by wifx6 with SMTP id x6so39062699wif.0 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.76.208 with SMTP id m16mr3231150wiw.39.1433572453011; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.156.226 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 23:34:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:34:12 +0800 Message-ID: From: Pindar Wong To: gabe appleton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043893abd257330517d39886 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (pindar.wong[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z17gR-0007PQ-0A Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:34:22 -0000 --f46d043893abd257330517d39886 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks Gabe. https://github.com/gappleto97/BlockSizeDebate github's reachable via vpn. p. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton wrote: > Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the > exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain. > > I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on > this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get > some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few leads to chase. > On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong" wrote: > >> Gabe, >> >> Did you ever get an answer to this? >> >> I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this >> and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the >> nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc. >> >> I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb >> blocks... but hey that's just me. >> >> p. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton >> wrote: >> >>> I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll >>> happily get a framework started. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman wrote: >>> >>>> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails >>>> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various >>>> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could >>>>> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if >>>>> the page gets approval. >>>>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate >>>>>> drives me nuts. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will >>>>>> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other >>>>>> smarter people have said over and over before, you're >>>>>> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is >>>>>> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mats >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>> >>> >> --f46d043893abd257330517d39886 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
github's reachable via vpn.

p.


On Sat, Jun 6= , 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com> w= rote:

Yeah. We made a git = repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the exclusive-by-default = wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain.

I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to st= art back up on this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin= so we can get some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few l= eads to chase.

On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong"= <pindar.wong= @gmail.com> wrote:
Gabe,

Did you ever get an ans= wer to this?

I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help wi= th some work on this and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm no= t sure I understand the nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of t= hings (or not) etc.

I would have thought that there would= be a testnet4 by now using 8mb blocks... but hey that's just me.
<= br>
p.




<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't have permission to create a page. If some= one else does, I'll happily get a framework started.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 = at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com> wrote:
I second this, I don't have = time to read the large number of emails generated every day from the block = size debate. A summary of the various positions and arguments would be extr= emely helpful.=C2=A0

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gapp= leto97@gmail.com> wrote:
Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way w= e could condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing t= o assist if the page gets approval.

On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson&quo= t; <mats@henricso= n.se> wrote:
= Hi!

My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
drives me nuts.

I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:

1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
=C2=A0 =C2=A0take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
=C2=A0 =C2=A0smarter people have said over and over before, you're
=C2=A0 =C2=A0wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.

2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
=C2=A0 =C2=A0just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.

Mats

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment




-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment



--f46d043893abd257330517d39886--