From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RnEli-0004JF-Nv for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:32:30 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1RnElg-0003Iu-HX for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:32:30 +0000 Received: by mail-iy0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z21so4221896iab.34 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:32:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.168.4 with SMTP id zs4mr18701136igb.28.1326827016259; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:03:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.161.66 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:03:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:03:36 -0800 Message-ID: From: Peter Vessenes To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f839c1bfb885d04b6bdfcf1 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1RnElg-0003Iu-HX Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:32:30 -0000 --e89a8f839c1bfb885d04b6bdfcf1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It seems to me that the internet as a whole has got this one covered. I say this as someone who thinks that BitCoin needs to choose its battles and craft its reputation extremely carefully; this isn't the most important fight for BitCoin, nor the most deadly. I do think SOPA and PIPA could impact bitcoin, what if, for instance, copyrighted material made its way into the blockchain? Already the DMCA would make it hard for someone publishing blocks online to do anything but cease under a DMCA request. SOPA, at least, would go farther and allow the US to cut all access to 'offending' sites elsewhere in the world. At any rate, I don't think these bills are 'aimed at' BitCoin, and the companies with the most stake are taking the threat quite seriously. --e89a8f839c1bfb885d04b6bdfcf1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It seems to me that the internet as a whole has got this one covered. I say= this as someone who thinks that BitCoin needs to choose its battles and cr= aft its reputation extremely carefully; this isn't the most important f= ight for BitCoin, nor the most deadly.

I do think SOPA and PIPA could impact bitcoin, what if,= for instance, copyrighted material made its way into the blockchain?=A0

Already the DMCA would make it hard for someone publ= ishing blocks online to do anything but cease under a DMCA request. SOPA, a= t least, would go farther and allow the US to cut all access to 'offend= ing' sites elsewhere in the world.

At any rate, I don't think these bills are 'aim= ed at' BitCoin, and the companies with the most stake are taking the th= reat quite seriously.
--e89a8f839c1bfb885d04b6bdfcf1--