From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B87C0037 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78C74109B for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org B78C74109B Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=MwdYwE28 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKiEB6ZjH7Ij for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A0794089B for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 2A0794089B Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5ca29c131ebso4156880a12.0 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 08:44:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703695486; x=1704300286; darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ED03JVs+RrHT6mcKwFq9pq8fNrTXcE5i2lF9a2zYmhE=; b=MwdYwE28io2vk8iNGFxiDkS5Ac/3IDzkjrRibH8QRx6aCWOQoIKMPZ3OJejWY+mthQ QTn4BfEliARaId1IITN3MXZnRliB0gLWxpp7JV34kghPwU8m+lDAiOKNFvKNT2AAjbVi +akNjFuDQdYt5BYkgygux4YBPUqmk6iBBx04GXW/S0D6uoNRp6c4DGIyNE5TbwofvRT6 V4XmmHA4rvrrEHmBAxlZwwQYfEE4lpTP9Ud5pT5BvlATsRpZQaCecPlx9q7Nr/0b9Pt0 hvYRVOnU9u1JRLLULgE1U12mZtWdqs25aU4W0vsFui20kMwF5AsclCzltvhL96AlG3K1 Cmdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703695486; x=1704300286; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ED03JVs+RrHT6mcKwFq9pq8fNrTXcE5i2lF9a2zYmhE=; b=EBm4dlrMhBbWjNun1BVPKVxy22GcWQbb4BqUYlZaMhp/3P0pqXQzaJ06d+xacPBL84 uUd4Z74AWHpwzBSSJOF9YBErThzDsdoh+WowMOkrT5vLZoHENsyjCZdAoty8EOfMHVck yPfWINAkdTgbxfIkKNkae0zAiggA6QfooquZan6KAr0GIM4uuRAc8VM8dTF+/PrVIoHo oP/91UaK7wOMOrM77NC47/WiQ91uOrOyRXoW3mPPoL/YaLtjgq7KepB0bQl/uOL41Itx nKEdzKFAQT5sqRJh7uLJ4OcDfksT8bLeFPc5MlgDg5DinCp2Hp1zcXtU+faTcxcQMkpV sRKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyZaApVXCRndru30WCyjjxCzMzqo/6z34Vd5puCgGpDTIDPqI76 TnaN0r/9fCNcZ/aHuJN2hzefRGxedXsv8nv+wyvDS+E00klerw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTLdI3Fyxdw5i8kM+FPjSnsBrMu6Pm2Kb4bcASBmvLYepSiIdahtmv5VX3VEtKjbwcs+6FxZYz3Zejmy5ZsnQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8911:b0:28c:8dc0:7eda with SMTP id u17-20020a17090a891100b0028c8dc07edamr999885pjn.91.1703695486154; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 08:44:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Greg Tonoski Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 17:44:51 +0100 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 17:26:31 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] [BUG]: Bitcoin blockspace price discrimination put simple transactions at disadvantage X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 16:44:48 -0000 Blockspace price for data of a simple transaction is higher than the one for data of other ("complex") transactions: 3 vs 1.49 "weight"/byte in the examples below: - 3=616 "weight" / 205 bytes (txid: aabbcce67f2aa71932f789cac5468d39e3d2224d8bebb7ca2c3bf8c41d567cdd) - 1.49=1140 "weight" / 767 bytes (txid: 1c35521798dde4d1621e9aa5a3bacac03100fca40b6fb99be546ec50c1bcbd4a). As a result, there are incentives structure distorted and critical inefficiencies/vulnerabilities (e.g. misallocation of block space, blockspace value destruction, disincentivized simple transaction, centralization around complex transactions originators). Price of blockspace should be the same for any data (1 byte = 1 byte, irrespectively of location inside or outside of witness), e.g. 205/205 and 767/767 bytes in the examples above. Perhaps, the solution (the same price, "weight" of each bit of a transaction) could be introduced as part of the next version of Segwit transactions. Let's fix it. What do you think?