From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5Zdx-0003Gn-P7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:14:09 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z5Zdv-0006Z6-8T for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:14:09 +0000 Received: by igbqq3 with SMTP id qq3so14788568igb.0 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:14:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=P9cQMvk7+2EqoP9BPwGVDCzsyVqeEiHJCyiksb7Pjhw=; b=lyO+6xMj/RzS8AXHDy1RbEbmvtugv+rxqD2Ke6HMzo9UTNtoogCk4iMU06rjmxP5dw 8FL4x2/zQxXtWjeoq/JsFWqbXaliIXF1LK7Y3swBt8Kh+0Seyt99NtFLVzzY8cjWlX6m 6sZT60Xcdk3YGrltlcDQSZTsgQkqnYWKEAJ9fWWMhCY7yVfEvYA96jcpeyIh6AtyOEDN aJWlEphqWeh4Pg6wWeedN0laj/VluM8I9LotQY+u4+8FGPvFpShrukmNcaTUeJKE4Acz KEC/aa1MW490BR5pSYuPzLivQVR8umRgAeyhayNlupuXlgjMUDXVR8FPxWc1T+5FGRuj ucaA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaYiEpiNuWOjY1Z7DTHdEkLuCCZ84lVK5WA3Bjysh0mxlV0beQNgeAa1FEiTIdFGHmymmu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.61.130 with SMTP id p2mr18047884igr.9.1434633241872; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.103.146 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:14:01 +0900 Message-ID: From: Team Ninki To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1Z5Zdv-0006Z6-8T Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Ninki Wallet view on blocksize debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:14:09 -0000 --047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I am the developer for Ninki Wallet which has recently been listed on bitcoin.org. FWIW I support the approach of the existing bitcoin core dev team having observed their work for the last year and their attitude towards consensus, a clear process for change and discussion of changes. I think, like everyone else, that the block size limit will have to be increased in the future, but I don't like to see this done in a gung-ho way without an established consensus on how bitcoin will scale *with* decentralization and maintain it's key value property. I would not support any group that attempts to fork the blockchain in the manner proposed using XT. I strongly urge Gavin to withdraw from this standoff and work with the bitcoin core devs via the existing and successful bip process. Thanks Ben --047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I am the developer for Ninki Wallet which has recently = been listed on=C2=A0bitco= in.org.

FWIW I support the approach of the = existing bitcoin core dev team having observed their work for the last year= and their attitude towards consensus, a clear process for change and discu= ssion of changes.=C2=A0
I think, like everyone = else, that the block size limit will have to be increased in the future, bu= t I don't like to see this done in a gung-ho way without an established= consensus on how bitcoin will scale *with* decentralization and maintain i= t's key value property.

I would not support= any group that attempts to fork the blockchain in the manner proposed usin= g XT. I strongly urge Gavin to withdraw from this standoff and work with th= e bitcoin core devs via the existing and successful bip process.

Thanks
<= br>
Ben
--047d7bdcaa0ec3e6ea0518ca94c7--