From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82382C for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 05:49:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-yb0-f179.google.com (mail-yb0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30D2140 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 05:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 4so21871370ybl.1 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 22:49:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rgrant-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=T1NbYlBnoiy9bo1+Zbo6P/v3BBhIojTfGQYty+f4A7c=; b=M9XjGhxNYSYnjsOUQBsGUmQRJnr4X6YVyNKf5sLlS/hmmHZeZRphLG7kRrO4FeA7sR zMpkGvUZ2+aTw9AZorIAM5KJHMn1Oa6R74JG2rukEKv7Lj+yAAOA9xI8CFRJpH4Ud2Xe hnzitiEbkCfPU5ZsihzPvaQ7HTdjsmU+orQ/c9aUBc2TZOGwp8m1eIF7VNFKI8eph8Oa VP8AB1x+Auk8etL+oniJu1xZ+0MW0qVcCOlZx3qJJXCveb/xoZ3PjzpKBeCxuphBmOhQ UirrJvtublKHHogi+XWpiPjYMEhy1O0rLbPU5uVQKhY0aIdkL7DErZQKmJV4NoEB/+UL rYbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=T1NbYlBnoiy9bo1+Zbo6P/v3BBhIojTfGQYty+f4A7c=; b=jvBEMGGGBP0LUBNWzQl63mrZ0RXXLPjrdtNQuNBKJli+rfk5hm49Bc19oU4XhnCTGn dEHEXz5LU72X7pZLkY7qYkreYIw73YILlIWmf+eJuELRe8JKXhNEqB2aaFTUxUPrbjEM Fp0/4kMdLXIrb3Jl23MuKE92fDPxmg3e1iw/IWQGPc9AIHibarWlocmofhIh1PUPHqnz OeCp9eeCgzmn8ygdTBimxjghq+wfsFRl3Dq1jZVIL4KTNOYvG3Hgi0zIhUQ2cokA3ILn XyQTMLxI2rGhBKJ4/LSn7xL9FSF7cAhIq2k7hlcRknZkrXuHMAlV1BXvdkioN8fGB2uh QNGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBOkfHIzUy1CsloQZbV8rM5kCy508vY8c/BfSbIRMf1ToGciWjp w3ojBxollfvvz232kCdLs/jSsb3LxGY7HZOukQ== X-Received: by 10.37.182.141 with SMTP id s13mr21132879ybj.114.1497160150386; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 22:49:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rgrant@rgrant.org Received: by 10.37.55.86 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 22:48:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87inkn14gq.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <87r2ze2833.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <63d03825-da9b-328d-56b8-0d062f3e0c62@mattcorallo.com> <87inkn14gq.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> From: Ryan Grant Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 01:48:39 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GsYegwZfg0kp5rkpv-prZu0XD5U Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Matt Corallo , shaolinfry Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP149 timeout-- why so far in the future? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 05:49:13 -0000 Is there any reason that BIP149 activation on November 16th would cause a problem?