From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF87107A for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 00:09:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com (mail-yw0-f171.google.com [209.85.161.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95E7F17F for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 00:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z185so38328020ywf.0 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:09:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rgrant-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RCuXVt80YSymynx7O8PA/NSW79cTyArkN4YXUACcwFk=; b=u2M1LrDfc3lUcz9Z62wGB+QOs5elpfio8r36nDFs9QFOkj/MH4zpjnq44kWXF8Kxbg YebWu62WJWTYeDaMPydMm3CEk5otF37Q+rf6BGtmPC7i5qZn1lMRrYGetgMm4WULoUK0 ky4Tzzk2a//dKUQT9WPz6B7/1mdDI3o83AJ7MNBns/mcVRBpw8v273BO7H5pQBA9dlcm fwLOeoP+yTNJvj/v3pKGKgRfNRefcHE/IPUSqz2fXTjDXGBe7bE6EQ/xCVtHosjm+Hv/ VdQTmNqzViGduhINtq3gCyMZXGLaGg2f82mQKyO2v3ulkmsBHJOWIno/6rFBzUYDuZrV 9zjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RCuXVt80YSymynx7O8PA/NSW79cTyArkN4YXUACcwFk=; b=CLrSPwCI7AbJVrSotVfyOShOSuNLnGuFdePYWNEO0+Mt0ihD9rOxlonHVI1MvWC6o6 kNSpzUQAAEeRXxbBPEOEnllp9FsmdgZFcCmnqp+uYPwN6JwcKJnVcYGR9bCx65OeT6yv W7u85odIjY99t7aQLFE/J0nCtOzuMmOmA200L9J5CVYqUYG92yx24jXUy/EuUdbk7Ziw Gb3tnGrNPk36hDimRZFrUT8H1JrdMRj3WXSb1fkOC7wSNDPg+eUFwno0mPYA6xrW8czI 6kglcodWF2Am04YVI0h7gRavkQm/fk87ASdENSReoArFx5+PmWtQNGeProQm/bwn7S32 gpRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR9QQsrrEw4W8bA962oSfWMSF1eWP1kpc6xoChGDCeMpaZCURhcJ4MN/hCW/IKZSA4mfDKvNxZhqI3hGg== X-Received: by 10.13.221.4 with SMTP id g4mr5258526ywe.293.1454630978913; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:09:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rgrant@rgrant.org Received: by 10.37.44.72 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:09:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201602042117.31076.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201602012253.18009.luke@dashjr.org> <201602040415.47580.luke@dashjr.org> <201602042117.31076.luke@dashjr.org> From: Ryan Grant Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 20:09:09 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zb8juA0C91I4AiKTebi_r9PjHS8 Message-ID: To: Luke Dashjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URIBL_SBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:15:54 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process: Status, comments, and copyright licenses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:09:40 -0000 On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Luke Dashjr wrote: > All review itself ought to remain on the ML. > the author-chosen forum may only be *in addition > to* the Bitcoin Wiki? Ahh, much better. Thank you. FWIW, this is the phrase that confused me: [BIP 2:] If a BIP is not yet completed, reviewers should [...]