From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F1B8EBA for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:38:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com (mail-qk1-f179.google.com [209.85.222.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87505D3 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id p10so17986475qkg.8 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:38:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bitcoinbank.co.jp; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=A0QEctaV+aQZVmqOfS5UuFLRU23BreIPudijxnKxL2o=; b=XgvL41JwV9gPF4IiVl8mxXD23UZQgadgiDI7q03vA/kRjOXXXQ10noQ2nuF4zhjbF5 M+3B4W7AxjSA7KWR+/dD8J2zmzanI5LsMYJMFaJQPGheOeTMFRGJUztCdLvcG7oGTQRy bl8/MzjInwNEDNgA2Pn665Y26phWEzeoL7j+f/2sJzau/cAP/199GbUTfxBhJisxdTFE IHSsSYiqYXl37k90qtnhtoVnhdyCsVIFnnszpiyX0y+MzGZzVbqlAjDv1nAA3Ytfc38U Yr0fwMaDegqDN1TrF3eC+rkYA0I9bJ3wkhTVIYg0O6M34a1VrSkjova67X+4zMYYXukZ WW6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=A0QEctaV+aQZVmqOfS5UuFLRU23BreIPudijxnKxL2o=; b=Y2orOfHJQtf4U7W4e+XtjA2FQJ7+p05D/DhJfGddtpYC+3hQmmnUbU8J7vlnXD1LJ6 p92dnJ8fqR4s4qa2um4SqfCkhHhCxAZAoh8Z30b+IksHExINK27AmDOW/8rItDnXIiuo CW80Vig8Anafj98xHfCznUVMix0dTj06XrTCxUGylDqF0yyL9WRPAYIANnL306rSli9E ufFMOTJZtuBobVolIpnVawXEExf0y+j+90qcEbv8CxS9d4QRYq2rKJAkJLgcemkgzABF XRolb4bNLF0xEnMx1tTBG9QLAkOhZYxYEiA1gWZJ/Vfzteg/iAxl7gr7FPCncJAInsgE VUug== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVg8dpSRoOcTBmTEDEjxeSB5j60f4KzoL2LXbz/racP0DxIzpve gMWgL2M48CkOrtNd3qW1XD0lI6rX6Ojxi2A2fXpzbvs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJRrHoJDAfpl0/TRBjbd/OcpOCf2anhXxNFBNHXjuXXT0pS98HGv2TToM94SjrXQ4SQTdWeRWibcuAtlAv5sM= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a5d3:: with SMTP id o202mr31008098qke.240.1571114320520; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:38:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Underwood Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:38:29 +0900 Message-ID: To: Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f9fbb10594eb8ea9" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:28:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Is Signet Bitcoin? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:38:42 -0000 --000000000000f9fbb10594eb8ea9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I would also like to agree that Signet should be a BIP. Problem: Testnet is unreliable. *Testnet is used often for development of Bitcoin*. Proposal: To improve the dev environment for Bitcoin, let's create a new kind of testnet that is more reliable. I would also like to hear the logic behind "Testnet is Bitcoin" but "Signet is not Bitcoin"... both are not 100% compatible with mainnet consensus processes. -Jon --000000000000f9fbb10594eb8ea9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would also like to agree that Signet should be a BIP.
Problem: Testnet is unreliable. *Testnet is used often for developmen= t of Bitcoin*.
Proposal: To improve the dev environment for Bitcoin, let= 's create a new kind of testnet that is more reliable.

I would a= lso like to hear the logic behind "Testnet is Bitcoin" but "= Signet is not Bitcoin"... both are not 100% compatible with mainnet co= nsensus processes.

-Jon
--000000000000f9fbb10594eb8ea9--