Yes. I think the problem is your fork has been under more development and upstream has stalled. The problem with this is it becomes unclear which repo is the main one as it really has become a fork and of course then development really does fork properly which is a shame because it doesn't nurture community contributions around the project which is really important.

Drak



On 15 March 2014 17:22, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:12:42PM +0000, Drak wrote:
> Would it make sense to pull that stuff in and add Peter with commit access
> since your repo is top of the fork tree.

I've noticed it looks like people actually using my 'pythonize' code
have been linking directly to my tree in things like documentation and
build scripts, so the URL is probably not a problem.

I did open a pull-req on the bitcoin.org repo to change that URL
however: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/346

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000ef4a047ecc7077b7855626b9c9bf07e528e0c6ace2da30a8