From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Vpldj-0004cA-3n for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:11:47 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org; helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Vpldi-0003zW-9G for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:11:47 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k14so2679214wgh.32 for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 13:11:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=XfQnauB4E3XjPh/K0hv5JzPak04LhKGhDobPp7hEHZk=; b=akO4mdy/6snakiCZt+35WlMIBNLxuEAOP2HHgj8NbFhh/q3YbvdCO6hZ7rQYUNaEGM mAZn35FwJVoukv9mzKdEs4uTuCdCRs4ze64Si9UEniZERIW7S7AeQpDBJYnY0qSBxE+C LtbNf4sX5gPzTvhVn4rWdNyZGMAVbxVP0Vu9xpMkexJJL4vwukxpXvV1RiEr9QaCXZUb 5zMcneyr3uV/gCanUiPhBKKGH9OKwW2tqi3pydpiictCZnDN+AFgS0pwZ3IeVtj9QlWl 6ALdNp4swoLCGC/cP9XazYPiZI6wuOQqGYi4si9SMI/HJW1h4jglo/B2Ygb4IRWu/55S nJSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlLaXAGbDDnZRMs0RzxtzidMz7aXfXJF6KNMbLTRSWD5Rlhl4FH8yX12P9y/68MSTxQcNh/ X-Received: by 10.180.103.193 with SMTP id fy1mr11444798wib.10.1386537100129; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 13:11:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.93.105 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 13:11:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201312082101.25609.luke@dashjr.org> References: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com> <201312082101.25609.luke@dashjr.org> From: Drak Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:11:20 +0000 Message-ID: To: Luke-Jr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428e3a523be504ed0c532f X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: dashjr.org] 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1Vpldi-0003zW-9G Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org, your thoughts? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:11:47 -0000 --f46d04428e3a523be504ed0c532f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 8 December 2013 21:01, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:51:07 PM Drak wrote: > > Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects > > (github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can > > be trusted so far. > > Can someone explain how Sirius has proven the least bit untrustworthy? It's not just about trust, there is the robustness factor: what if he becomes sick, unavailable, hit by a bus? Others need the ability to pickup and run with it. The control over the domain (including ability to renew registration, alter nameservers) needs to be with more than one person. That's why I suggest using the same people who have control over the software project at sf,github. --f46d04428e3a523be504ed0c532f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 8= December 2013 21:01, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
On Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:51:07 PM Drak wrote:
> Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects
> (github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they = can
> be trusted so far.

Can someone explain how Sirius has proven the least bit untrustworthy= ?

It's not just about trust, there is t= he robustness factor: what if he becomes sick, unavailable, hit by a bus? O= thers need the ability to pickup and run with it. The control over the doma= in (including ability to renew registration, alter nameservers) needs to be= with more than one person. That's why I suggest using the same people = who have control over the software project at sf,github.



--f46d04428e3a523be504ed0c532f--