From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <drak@zikula.org>) id 1WJTrx-0005sR-0I for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:17 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.173; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org; helo=mail-we0-f173.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WJTru-0003uF-VP for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:16 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w61so963385wes.4 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:17:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=stw2JvKdloLs16Mv9I+eVQRVz5CenroXq69cYSGKIqQ=; b=L+XZmXp3wL5dhfi0RKW8fnwzT7OQTvFnNVomIL8aa8VxcZh8e5f4zZAUjqY/bkkruU G0D7h5OAayHeO218WatMXS9yG30qjSfAGtlu/v69UzwMVoyCbZJFo0apYUTvem5sRm86 tlJfm4oESdaF8BqduZ0Dcfd/WEOOE7CSuJ9nOww5mgXoWdqKvGQZ9eskCRit3oZ4zGc0 Knq6P1Wu1IFQdLBXsL0yo9ChFq0uuSS493c8CugATADZUY5qr1t1+9Xu5Rnh3ZcPBAP3 CEDWxYWvvp85jsilTcAHaTkIxcga/NlXZXrT4fJUJAv3isNDwKeVA/16OBymEmQ5RQ1b q3FA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmFne95Q63LLIYqh5ddaSnLWtLbbBFEpVntUNYpWdphLXdDRfAJeMuwgGZhZDlEuYZ29by7 X-Received: by 10.194.204.229 with SMTP id lb5mr4148022wjc.67.1393618252500; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:10:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.205.69 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:10:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <CAEz79Po37XkoQ=+kQOTdagVn-vYuqYwotQf58YcgTndaaAmXNw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJHLa0PXHY1qisXhN98DMxgp11ouqkzYMBvrTTNOtwX09T1kZg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+s+GJC1FgCW9spkViMPvuWNS84Ys33pj=RP1ZpzBCa++e-iMQ@mail.gmail.com> <530B8000.1070801@monetize.io> <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop> <CAEz79Po37XkoQ=+kQOTdagVn-vYuqYwotQf58YcgTndaaAmXNw@mail.gmail.com> From: Drak <drak@zikula.org> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:10:32 +0000 Message-ID: <CANAnSg346s0FqhP+57f1TdnCj3=MVht--qGTCpO+BxOpHA=9Uw@mail.gmail.com> To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1WJTru-0003uF-VP Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:17:17 -0000 --047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 28 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d > > In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely > failed to account for the actual cost to the network. If Bitcoin had > adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join > Litecoin development last year. This is one of the few economic design > flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design. > Is there any particular reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if submitted? Drak --047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 2= 8 February 2014 14:42, Warren Togami Jr. <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"m= ailto:wtogami@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">wtogami@gmail.com</a>></span>= wrote:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D""><div><a hre= f=3D"https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4= c807aa1534a074e4b7964d" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/litecoin-proje= ct/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d</a><br> </div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"> <div><br></div><div>In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilo= byte completely failed to account for the actual cost to the network. =C2= =A0If Bitcoin had adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had n= o reason to join Litecoin development last year. =C2=A0This is one of the f= ew economic design flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.</d= iv> </div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is there any particular = reason that patch would not make it into bitcoin if submitted?</div><div><b= r>Drak=C2=A0</div></div></div></div> --047d7bae4664e4a5e204f37d08a4--