From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YWXke-0000BI-Bz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:08:16 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.180; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f180.google.com; Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YWXkc-0000tQ-90 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:08:16 +0000 Received: by iegc3 with SMTP id c3so132741098ieg.3 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:08:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.28.8 with SMTP id x8mr88305277igg.19.1426284488480; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.54.147 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:08:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55035EAC.80201@localhost.local> References: <55034205.4030607@localhost.local> <55035EAC.80201@localhost.local> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:08:08 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: geBA-lWJ7t2ot-mJZt6Qxm0lC4w Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Justus Ranvier Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e015386d648e014051132bc26 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YWXkc-0000tQ-90 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against "network disruption as a service" startups X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:08:16 -0000 --089e015386d648e014051132bc26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > I'm not talking about keeping logs, I mean purporting to be a network > peer in order to gain a connection slot and then not behaving as one > (not relaying transactions) That definition would include all SPV clients? I get what you are trying to do. It just seems extremely tricky. --089e015386d648e014051132bc26 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
I'm not talking about keeping logs, I mean purporting to be a network
peer in order to gain a connection slot and then not behaving as one
(not relaying transactions)

That definition would include all SPV clients?

I get what you are trying to do. It just seems extremely tricky.
--089e015386d648e014051132bc26--