public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:39:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0zKe7hK0KjiXN9M6CHnJxKZfW9myez3G+GWpr3fugBCg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOG=w-s7JkB6SyEE0=KwmrasyH22aB2Zf3jBdKcXvrGoNhN_Nw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]

>
> Mike, this proposal was purposefully constructed to maintain as well as
> possible the semantics of Satoshi's original construction. Higher sequence
> numbers -- chronologically later transactions -- are able to hit the chain
> earlier, and therefore it can be reasonably argued will be selected by
> miners before the later transactions mature. Did I fail in some way to
> capture that original intent?
>

Right, but the original protocol allowed for e.g. millions of revisions of
the transaction, hence for high frequency trading (that's actually how
Satoshi originally explained it to me - as a way to do HFT - back then the
channel concept didn't exist).

As you point out, with a careful construction of channels you should only
need to bump the sequence number when the channel reverses direction. If
your app only needs to do that rarely, it's a fine approach.And your
proposal does sounds better than sequence numbers being useless like at the
moment. I'm just wondering if we can get back to the original somehow or at
least leave a path open to it, as it seems to be a superset of all other
proposals, features-wise.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1489 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-27 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-27  1:50 [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
2015-05-27  7:47 ` Peter Todd
2015-05-27  8:18   ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-05-27 10:00     ` Tier Nolan
2015-05-27 10:58     ` Peter Todd
2015-05-27 17:07       ` Jorge Timón
2015-05-27  8:04 ` Telephone Lemien
2015-05-27 10:11 ` Mike Hearn
2015-05-27 15:26   ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-05-27 17:39     ` Mike Hearn [this message]
2015-05-28  9:56       ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-05-28 10:23         ` Mike Hearn
2015-05-28 10:30         ` Tier Nolan
2015-05-28 12:04           ` Peter Todd
2015-05-28 13:35             ` Tier Nolan
2015-05-28 16:22               ` s7r
2015-05-28 17:21                 ` Tier Nolan
2015-05-28 14:59           ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-05-28 15:18             ` Tier Nolan
2015-05-28 15:38               ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-05-28 15:57                 ` Tier Nolan
2015-06-10  2:40                   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANEZrP0zKe7hK0KjiXN9M6CHnJxKZfW9myez3G+GWpr3fugBCg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mike@plan99.net \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mark@friedenbach.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox