From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wk9yr-0002Be-Gu for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 May 2014 10:30:41 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.44; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f44.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wk9yq-00056j-H2 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 May 2014 10:30:41 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id o6so139159oag.3 for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 03:30:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.219.167 with SMTP id pp7mr1491040obc.85.1399977035007; Tue, 13 May 2014 03:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.71.162 with HTTP; Tue, 13 May 2014 03:30:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:30:34 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IYHPXauK7HIiBd9uibqs4f8Jy6Y Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: "Warren Togami Jr." Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Wk9yq-00056j-H2 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:30:41 -0000 --089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be changed. You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be the same? On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > Hi folks, > > I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be > unique so they are no longer identical to testnet. > > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes > For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R. > > We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to support > this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester expect > regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that currently > handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new address versions. > > Warren Togami > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. > Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform > available > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would als= o have to be changed.

You didn't provide a rationale= for this. What's the cost of having them be the same?


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren= Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi folks,

I propose changing all of the= address versions in -regtest mode to be unique so they are no longer ident= ical to testnet.

For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or= R.

We need to know if any existing tools would ne= ed to be modified to support this change to regtest. =C2=A0Do existing tool= s outside of pull tester expect regtest to have testnet addresses? =C2=A0If= the quantity of tools that currently handle regtest is small then we can m= odify them to the new address versions.

Warren Togami


-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE=
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform availa= ble
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net= /sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment


--089e0141ab82dd926404f9458d59--