public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Missing fRelayTxes in version
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:36:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1MVKSNU92UrQ36sPCN0LNLKrVRXnfVwEZKhgoBFXatBA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE0E45E-BB48-4DFF-9C86-ACBE312B3049@bitsofproof.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1679 bytes --]

Sure but why not do that when there's an actual new field to add? Does
anyone have a proposal for a feature that needs a new version field at the
moment? There's no point changing the protocol now unless there's actually
a new field to add.

Anyway I still don't see why anyone cares about this issue. The Bitcoin
protocol does not and never has required that all messages have a fixed
number of fields per version. Any parser written on the assumption it did
was just buggy. Look at how tx messages are relayed for the most obvious
example of that pattern in action - it's actually the raw byte stream
that's stored and relayed to ensure that fields added in new versions
aren't dropped during round-tripping. Old versions are supposed to preserve
fields from the future.



On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> The issue with the current parser is that those fields are conditionally
> optional on that there will be no subsequent fields added.
> If there will be further fields they will become manadory.
>
> Why not bump the version and parse the fields as mandatory from then on?
> This would be backward compatible and cleaner
> going forward.
>
> Tamas Blummer
> http://bitsofproof.com
>  <http://bitsofproof.com/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5506 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-20  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-20  7:30 [Bitcoin-development] Missing fRelayTxes in version Tamas Blummer
2013-06-20  7:36 ` Mike Hearn [this message]
2013-06-20  8:17   ` Tamas Blummer
2013-06-20  8:31     ` Mike Hearn
2013-06-20  8:39       ` Tamas Blummer
2013-06-20  9:06   ` Pieter Wuille
2013-06-20  9:17     ` Mike Hearn
2013-06-20 10:37       ` Turkey Breast
2013-06-20 10:50         ` Mike Hearn
2013-06-20 10:52         ` Pieter Wuille
2013-06-20 10:58           ` Mike Hearn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANEZrP1MVKSNU92UrQ36sPCN0LNLKrVRXnfVwEZKhgoBFXatBA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mike@plan99.net \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tamas@bitsofproof.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox