From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TR3vK-0003cu-8X for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:18 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1TR3vG-0006J5-EB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:18 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id dr1so443602wgb.10 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.99 with SMTP id g3mr7176033wiz.5.1351096508259; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.236.30 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.236.30 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121024162255.GA30290@vps7135.xlshosting.net> References: <20121024162255.GA30290@vps7135.xlshosting.net> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:35:08 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Tciy_f6HX-M39bkwYM6EXgCY3Nk Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Pieter Wuille Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21 X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1TR3vG-0006J5-EB Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Draft BIP for Bloom filtering X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:18 -0000 --f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Some questions: > * why limit the number of matching transactions to 255? Copy/paste error in the does :( > * what does "each hash and key in the output script" mean exactly? what about the output script in its entirety? It's an informal way to say data elements. If you insert a key then it matches both single and multi sig outputs regardless of location. > * is sharing parts of the merkle branches not worth it? We think probably not. --f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


> Some questions:
> * why limit the number of matching transactions to 255?

Copy/paste error in the does :(

> * what does "each hash and key in the output script" mean exactly? what about the output script in its entirety?

It's an informal way to say data elements. If you insert a key then it matches both single and multi sig outputs regardless of location.

> * is sharing parts of the merkle branches not worth it?

We think probably not.

--f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21--