From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Isidor Zeuner <cryptocurrencies@quidecco.de>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network paper
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:20:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANEZrP2H8P0nh6224UKbnZ7EXrNE6jwM_SZSj6UaMn1QqWumDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150122004416.93EFDE27748@quidecco.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]
>
> I hear that. But I don't see why mainstream wallets and wallets
> designed for crypto research should not share a common core.
>
I think there was some misunderstanding. I was saying they *could and
should* share common cores, so we are in agreement without realising it :)
I also didn't mean to imply there was anything special about bitcoinj, just
that it's an example of a wallet engine that's already in use.
> BIP70 is interesting, indeed, although I still fail to understand why
> (according to the specs I saw) the PaymentRequest message is signed,
> but not the Payment message.
>
Because it's intended to be submitted via HTTPS. But what would you sign
the message with? Some arbitrary key bound to the transaction?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1161 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 7:47 [Bitcoin-development] Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network paper Jean-Paul Kogelman
2014-11-26 13:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-11-26 17:13 ` odinn
2014-11-27 2:09 ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-11-27 2:22 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-11-27 11:06 ` Mike Hearn
2014-11-27 11:27 ` Wladimir
2014-12-08 16:15 ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-12-08 16:59 ` Mike Hearn
2015-01-22 0:44 ` Isidor Zeuner
2015-01-22 13:20 ` Mike Hearn [this message]
2014-12-15 13:25 ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-12-01 10:42 ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-11-27 17:44 Mistr Bigs
2014-11-27 20:30 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-11-28 0:45 Mistr Bigs
2014-11-28 5:30 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-12-11 11:51 ` Isidor Zeuner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANEZrP2H8P0nh6224UKbnZ7EXrNE6jwM_SZSj6UaMn1QqWumDg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mike@plan99.net \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=cryptocurrencies@quidecco.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox