From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WNlcQ-0001Xu-BY for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:02:58 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.49; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f49.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.219.49]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WNlcP-0000EJ-Lf for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:02:58 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id g12so10168208oah.22 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:02:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.133.142 with SMTP id pc14mr35021562oeb.32.1394640172334; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.71.231 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:02:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <531DFDF8.80008@gmail.com> <531E52FE.5090107@jerviss.org> <531E5454.1030601@gmail.com> <4fca6b510dd57d2f92affeb988d2ee5d.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net> <531FAA55.2020108@xeno-genesis.com> <531FC808.7060709@gmail.com> <9A6499BC-E546-45CC-A7EF-5182FC86052D@gmail.com> <53202D51.8010008@plan99.net> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:02:52 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: J6SJ98wmwJ0NnsiFrEnCsJbaZlk Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b47289c0fc54004f46af89a X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WNlcP-0000EJ-Lf Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Multisign payment protocol? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:02:58 -0000 --047d7b47289c0fc54004f46af89a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > This is what bitcoind produces and expects by default, for a partially > signed transaction. What happens if the act of filling out the signature pushes the transaction into a higher fee level? --047d7b47289c0fc54004f46af89a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is what bitcoind produces and expects by de= fault, for a partially
signed transaction.

What happens if the act= of filling out the signature pushes the transaction into a higher fee leve= l?=C2=A0
--047d7b47289c0fc54004f46af89a--