public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Andrew Miller <amiller@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 07:28:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANEZrP33SSVVj_+bLXiK_HZLDGr8t7PJLs5f2QPrDRB_1mn__A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF7tpEyHyg7cB8DQiwb-gGg5v5Hn1Kurw2GaVtid=LyJrB1XQA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2764 bytes --]

Nice, Andrew.

Just one minor point. SPV clients do not need to maintain an ever growing
list of PoW solutions. BitcoinJ uses a ring buffer with 5000 headers and
thus has O(1) disk usage. Re-orgs past the event horizon cannot be
processed but are assumed to be sufficiently rare that manual intervention
would be acceptable.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Miller <amiller@cs.umd.edu> wrote:

> We (Joseph Bonneau, myself Arvind Narayanan, Jeremy Clark, Ed Felten,
> Josh Kroll -- from Stanford, Maryland, Concordia, Princeton) have
> written a “systemization” paper about Bitcoin-related research. It’s
> going to appear in the Oakland security conference later this year
> (IEEE Security and Privacy) but we wanted to announce a draft to this
> community ahead of time.
>
> http://www.jbonneau.com/doc/BMCNKF15-IEEESP-bitcoin.pdf
>
> One of the main goals of our work is to build a bridge between the
> computer science research community and the cryptocurrency community.
> Many of the most interesting ideas and proposals for Bitcoin come from
> this mailing list and forums/wikis/irc channels, where many academic
> researchers simply don’t know to look! In fact, we started out by
> scraping all the interesting posts/articles we could find and trying
> to figure out how we could organize them. We hope our paper helps some
> of the best ideas and research questions from the Bitcoin community
> bubble up and inspires researchers to build on them.
>
> We didn’t limit our scope to Bitcoin, but we also decided not to
> provide a complete survey of altcoins and other next-generation
> cryptocurrency designs. Instead, we tried to explain all the
> dimensions along which these designs differ from Bitcoin.
>
> This effort has roughly been in progress over two years, though it
> stopped and restarted several times along the way.
>
> If anyone has comments or suggestions, we still have a week before the
> final version is due, and regardless we plan to continue updating our
> online version for the forseeable future.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
> all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
> to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3453 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-04 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02 16:48 [Bitcoin-development] New paper: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Andrew Miller
2015-03-03  1:57 ` Ricardo Filipe
2015-03-04 12:19 ` Tim Ruffing
2015-03-04 15:28 ` Mike Hearn [this message]
2015-03-08 12:23   ` Pindar Wong
2015-03-05  5:06 Stephen Reed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANEZrP33SSVVj_+bLXiK_HZLDGr8t7PJLs5f2QPrDRB_1mn__A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mike@plan99.net \
    --cc=Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=amiller@cs.umd.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox