public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Jeremy Spilman <jeremy@taplink.co>
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:37:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANEZrP3V+AhoMwq=UmatrhF19cswVm3LX19PwqrURPFqnTw-Xg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.xb09eip8yldrnw@laptop-air>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1687 bytes --]

I'm hoping I can convince Saivann to do a bit of graphics work for this at
some point :-)

Something like a green stamp that appears (like a watermark) in the
background, might be good.


On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Jeremy Spilman <jeremy@taplink.co> wrote:

>  On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:26:57 -0800, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Such a thing would be interesting for a future BIP standard. I see one
> problem here: for an unsigned payment request there isn't really an
> "origin". Browser URI handlers don't send the referrer either.
>
>
> Yeah, good point. If you have a cert, we have the CN from the cert, which
> becomes the string displayed as 'Pay To' and alternatively 'Merchant'.
>
> But if there's no cert then all you have is memo.
>
> So the best way to differentiate signed requests is by prominently
> displaying that Merchant string. Really the green part should just be the
> 'Pay To' line, the rest is content. If it showed a BLANK 'Pay To' that
> would make the lack of certificate highly apparent.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
> Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer
> Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports.
> Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2648 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-02 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-01  6:26 [Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors Jeremy Spilman
2014-03-01  7:26 ` Wladimir
2014-03-01  7:50   ` Jeremy Spilman
2014-03-02 10:37     ` Mike Hearn [this message]
2014-03-02  7:52 ` [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol Hash Comments Jeremy Spilman
2014-03-02  8:44   ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-02  8:52     ` Drak
2014-03-02 10:39       ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-03 12:39         ` Drak
2014-03-02 18:18 ` [Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors Troy Benjegerdes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANEZrP3V+AhoMwq=UmatrhF19cswVm3LX19PwqrURPFqnTw-Xg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mike@plan99.net \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jeremy@taplink.co \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox