From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4ROd-0003fj-Fm for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:13:39 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.42; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f42.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z4ROc-0000N0-F9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:13:39 +0000 Received: by wgbhy7 with SMTP id hy7so31494329wgb.2 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 03:13:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.181.11.193 with SMTP id ek1mr30098565wid.15.1434363212501; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 03:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.14.196 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 03:13:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:13:32 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MYpJSYCxbWvBGUH8j6nkIRH1ISs Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: "Warren Togami Jr." Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bdedac2986f05188bb5d8 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z4ROc-0000N0-F9 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:13:39 -0000 --f46d043bdedac2986f05188bb5d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Bear in mind the problem that stops Jeff's messages getting through is that mailman 1.0 doesn't know how to handle DKIM properly. Switching to a different mailman provider won't fix that. Does mailman 3.0 even fix this? I found it difficult to tell from their website. There's a big page on the mailman wiki that suggests they "fixed" it by simply deleting the signatures entirely, which won't work. DMARC policies state that mail *must* be signed and unsigned/incorrectly signed message should be discarded. The user documentation for mailman 3 doesn't seem to exist? The links on the website are docs for 2.1, perhaps they released mailman 3 without refreshing the docs. Google Groups may be "controversial" but if I recall correctly the main issue was the question of whether you needed a Google account or not. I'm pretty sure you can just send an email to groupname+subscribe@googlegroups.com even if you don't have a Google account. But of course this is a bizarre standard to hold mailing list software to: mailman asks users to create an account for each listserv in order to manage a subscription too! --f46d043bdedac2986f05188bb5d8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bear in mind the problem that s= tops Jeff's messages getting through is that mailman 1.0 doesn't kn= ow how to handle DKIM properly. Switching to a different mailman provider w= on't fix that.

Does mailman 3.0 even fix this? I found it difficult to tell f= rom their website. There's a big page on the mailman wiki that suggests= they "fixed" it by simply deleting the signatures entirely, whic= h won't work. DMARC policies state that mail must=C2=A0be signed= and unsigned/incorrectly signed message should be discarded.

The user documentat= ion for mailman 3 doesn't seem to exist? The links on the website are d= ocs for 2.1, perhaps they released mailman 3 without refreshing the docs.

Google = Groups may be "controversial" but if I recall correctly the main = issue was the question of whether you needed a Google account or not. I'= ;m pretty sure you can just send an email to groupname+subscribe@googlegroups.com even i= f you don't have a Google account. But of course this is a bizarre stan= dard to hold mailing list software to: mailman asks users to create an acco= unt for each listserv in order to manage a subscription too!

--f46d043bdedac2986f05188bb5d8--