public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed additional options for pruned nodes
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:41:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANJO25+yXnkQm8ATq694PurDKGBPTkCcJzD4fJaPS4Jy9HmbTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHLa0O3fgmg4AFAM9+4RRkhSo8ekATs2Ks+Ry7ooQafjQ-4qw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2355 bytes --]

I suppose this begs two questions:

1) why not have a partial archive store the most recent X% of the
blockchain by default?

2) why not include some sort of torrent in QT, to mitigate this risk? I
don't think this is necessarily a good idea, but I'd like to hear the
reasoning.
On May 12, 2015 4:11 PM, "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:

> True.  Part of the issue rests on the block sync horizon/cliff.  There is
> a value X which is the average number of blocks the 90th percentile of
> nodes need in order to sync.  It is sufficient for the [semi-]pruned nodes
> to keep X blocks, after which nodes must fall back to archive nodes for
> older data.
>
> There is simply far, far more demand for recent blocks, and the demand for
> old blocks very rapidly falls off.
>
> There was even a more radical suggestion years ago - refuse to sync if too
> old (>2 weeks?), and force the user to download ancient data via torrent.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:
>> > One general problem is that security is weakened when an attacker can
>> DoS a
>> > small part of the chain by DoS'ing a small number of nodes - yet the
>> impact
>> > is a network-wide DoS because nobody can complete a sync.
>>
>> It might be more interesting to think of that attack as a bandwidth
>> exhaustion DOS attack on the archive nodes... if you can't get a copy
>> without them, thats where you'll go.
>>
>> So the question arises: does the option make some nodes that would
>> have been archive not be? Probably some-- but would it do so much that
>> it would offset the gain of additional copies of the data when those
>> attacks are not going no. I suspect not.
>>
>> It's also useful to give people incremental ways to participate even
>> when they can't swollow the whole pill; or choose to provide the
>> resource thats cheap for them to provide.  In particular, if there is
>> only two kinds of full nodes-- archive and pruned; then the archive
>> nodes take both a huge disk and bandwidth cost; where as if there are
>> fractional then archives take low(er) bandwidth unless the fractionals
>> get DOS attacked.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3223 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-12 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CANJO25J1WRHtfQLVXUB2s_sjj39pTPWmixAcXNJ3t-5os8RPmQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-12 15:26 ` [Bitcoin-development] Proposed additional options for pruned nodes gabe appleton
2015-05-12 16:05   ` Jeff Garzik
2015-05-12 16:56     ` gabe appleton
2015-05-12 17:16     ` Peter Todd
2015-05-12 18:23       ` Tier Nolan
2015-05-12 19:03         ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-05-12 19:24           ` gabe appleton
2015-05-12 19:38             ` Jeff Garzik
2015-05-12 19:43               ` gabe appleton
2015-05-12 21:30                 ` [Bitcoin-development] [Bulk] " gb
2015-05-12 20:02               ` [Bitcoin-development] " Gregory Maxwell
2015-05-12 20:10                 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-05-12 20:41                   ` gabe appleton [this message]
2015-05-12 20:47                   ` Gregory Maxwell
     [not found]               ` <CAFVoEQTdmCSRAy3u26q5oHdfvFEytZDBfQb_fs_qttK15fiRmg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                 ` <CAJHLa0OxxxiVd3JOp8SDvbF8dHj6KHdUNGb9L_GvTe93z3Z8mg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <CAJHLa0MYSpVBD4VE65LVbADb2daOvE=N83G8F_zDSHy3AQ5DAQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-12 21:17                     ` [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: " Adam Weiss
2015-05-12 22:00           ` [Bitcoin-development] " Tier Nolan
2015-05-12 22:09             ` gabe appleton
2015-05-13  5:19           ` Daniel Kraft
2015-05-13  9:34             ` Tier Nolan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANJO25+yXnkQm8ATq694PurDKGBPTkCcJzD4fJaPS4Jy9HmbTg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gappleto97@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@bitpay.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox