From: gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
To: Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:52:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANJO25K+tG3uH+GH8i4PBjdk8KyJZDAunfwMmWedOJyZOk7wNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEM=y+Xf9b1p-KB-PKzjtMirM8_WMbpMZuQyGyDv+6GM=0O9hA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1855 bytes --]
I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll
happily get a framework started.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com> wrote:
> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various
> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could
>> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if
>> the page gets approval.
>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <mats@henricson.se> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
>>> drives me nuts.
>>>
>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
>>>
>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
>>> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
>>> smarter people have said over and over before, you're
>>> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.
>>>
>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
>>> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.
>>>
>>> Mats
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3155 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-01 22:22 [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate Mats Henricson
2015-06-02 3:02 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-02 3:32 ` Ethan Heilman
2015-06-02 3:52 ` gabe appleton [this message]
2015-06-06 3:34 ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06 6:28 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-06 6:34 ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06 6:37 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-06 6:39 ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06 6:41 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-08 0:55 ` gabe appleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANJO25K+tG3uH+GH8i4PBjdk8KyJZDAunfwMmWedOJyZOk7wNw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gappleto97@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eth3rs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox