public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
To: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 02:28:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANJO25L-r+3_kR8FD1EZ0F1_Cz9fUO5c8Fz=DW-yKZuONa4qkw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM7BtUoMHE4EwJAFCfOino0UKU5B4-Wzswfvttqs8=mBayK1OA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3172 bytes --]

Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the
exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain.

I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on
this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get
some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few leads to chase.
On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.wong@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gabe,
>
> Did you ever get an answer to this?
>
> I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this and
> will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the
> nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc.
>
> I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb
> blocks... but hey that's just me.
>
> p.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll
>> happily get a framework started.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
>>> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various
>>> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could
>>>> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if
>>>> the page gets approval.
>>>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <mats@henricson.se> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
>>>>> drives me nuts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
>>>>>    take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
>>>>>    smarter people have said over and over before, you're
>>>>>    wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
>>>>>    just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mats
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5188 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-06  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01 22:22 [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate Mats Henricson
2015-06-02  3:02 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-02  3:32   ` Ethan Heilman
2015-06-02  3:52     ` gabe appleton
2015-06-06  3:34       ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06  6:28         ` gabe appleton [this message]
2015-06-06  6:34           ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06  6:37             ` gabe appleton
2015-06-06  6:39               ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06  6:41                 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-08  0:55                   ` gabe appleton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANJO25L-r+3_kR8FD1EZ0F1_Cz9fUO5c8Fz=DW-yKZuONa4qkw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=gappleto97@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pindar.wong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox