Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate

[gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3846 bytes --]

Please use the one it's originally forked from that Ethan made. I don't
want to be the one who sorts through what's valid and what isn't, as I
don't have as low-level an understanding as I'd like. I don't feel
qualified.
On Jun 6, 2015 2:34 AM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.wong@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Gabe.
>
> https://github.com/gappleto97/BlockSizeDebate
>
> github's reachable via vpn.
>
> p.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the
>> exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain.
>>
>> I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on
>> this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get
>> some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few leads to chase.
>> On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.wong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Gabe,
>>>
>>> Did you ever get an answer to this?
>>>
>>> I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this
>>> and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the
>>> nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc.
>>>
>>> I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb
>>> blocks... but hey that's just me.
>>>
>>> p.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll
>>>> happily get a framework started.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
>>>>> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various
>>>>> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could
>>>>>> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if
>>>>>> the page gets approval.
>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <mats@henricson.se> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
>>>>>>> drives me nuts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
>>>>>>>    take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
>>>>>>>    smarter people have said over and over before, you're
>>>>>>>    wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
>>>>>>>    just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mats
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6386 bytes --]