From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YrAVa-0006km-Lg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 09 May 2015 19:33:58 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YrAVZ-00080n-Je for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 09 May 2015 19:33:58 +0000 Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so58919317wid.0 for ; Sat, 09 May 2015 12:33:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=X0jusF9MzRbRLgi8RjqVvKpvFwSvc5DMy/mEsruXIKw=; b=CAIh/JTH6F1pQLOCxgytRBpHqFicFj4swK3z1MB4LSSjlhR8JMECHwznDmbR9/nTAq RDjPqPOx9fXccSpkEiJXm1+D2oXJtnxH0cGYbvIfIuno4EPgZFfkHxyqVqsMGeyWKcsF 8/Xx+YvRLFX3xgIdXb3xZlkeX5uM/AI45bP8hNEiJHkjLxGUMZ7V0Mk8vJZWLPVZuOFM wj7v3/CGAhx231gU9f6HMCXy1MO6FNkH8Rqzyt7zZv50BxRffpXHzkuvrrrvEE33TOMF 8ZYSZ0nfnCMvMH+V3XJQjDDSLhyQEmq/dEUpnpFqteA3WnSSyO0M5d6gb4Mvwo/rFM51 IAcg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnqZlO/Jn8HwFHAYyWGYe2fijxVmfQGC3v6Z9g+1t5Tc2geHZD58cpmpk2gFMTD59tJUk3V X-Received: by 10.180.99.39 with SMTP id en7mr7938351wib.31.1431200031604; Sat, 09 May 2015 12:33:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.246.69 with HTTP; Sat, 9 May 2015 12:33:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jim Phillips Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 14:33:21 -0500 Message-ID: To: Raystonn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041828087c96030515ab3938 X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1YrAVZ-00080n-Je Cc: Bitcoin Dev , Andreas Schildbach Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 19:33:58 -0000 --f46d041828087c96030515ab3938 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Raystonn wrote: > Lack of privacy is viral. We shouldn't encourage policy in most wallets > that discourages privacy. It adversely affects privacy across the entire > network. > How about this as a happy medium default policy: Rather than select UTXOs based solely on age and limiting the size of the transaction, we select as many UTXOs as possible from as few addresses as possible, prioritizing which addresses to use based on the number of UTXOs it contains (more being preferable) and how old those UTXOs are (in order to reduce the fee)? --f46d041828087c96030515ab3938 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, May 9, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Raystonn <raystonn@hotmail.com> wrote:

Lack of privacy = is viral.=C2=A0 We shouldn't encourage policy in most wallets that disc= ourages privacy.=C2=A0 It adversely affects privacy across the entire netwo= rk.

How about this as a happy medium default policy: R= ather than select UTXOs based solely on age and limiting the size of the tr= ansaction, we select as many UTXOs as possible from as few addresses as pos= sible, prioritizing which addresses to use based on the number of UTXOs it = contains (more being preferable) and how old those UTXOs are (in order to r= educe the fee)?=C2=A0
--f46d041828087c96030515ab3938--