Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers

[Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:

>
> The whole point is getting out in front of the need, to prevent
> significant negative impact to users when blocks are consistently full.
>
> To do that, you need to (a) plan forward, in order to (b) set a hard fork
> date in the future.
>

Or alternatively, fix the reasons why users would have negative experiences
with full blocks, chiefly:

  * Get safe forms of replace-by-fee and child-pays-for-parent finished and
in 0.12.
  * Develop cross-platform libraries for managing micropayment channels,
and get wallet authors to adopt
  * Use fidelity bonds, solvency proofs, and other tricks to minimize the
risk of already deployed off-chain solutions as an interim measure until:
  * Deploy soft-fork changes for truly scalable solutions like Lightning
Network.

Not raising the block size limit does not mean doing nothing to solve the
problem.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1362 bytes --]