From: John Tromp <john.tromp@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Timelocks and Lightning on MimbleWimble
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:16:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOU__fw11EmAJzay7-H7X3my5+xNGGo_BS6_1hphauPXTgbw8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1791.1568888841.8631.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> However, I believe that Lightning and similar offchain protocols are **not possible** on MimbleWimble, at least if we want to retain its "magical shrinking blockchain" property.
MimbleWimble can easily incorporate relative lock heights, in addition
to absolute lock heights. Grin and Beam have included the latter since
launch.
Grin's proposal for relative lock heights is at [1] with discussion at [2].
Based on these, Grin also has a rough design for payment channels at [3].
Beam included relative lock heights in its recent HardFork [4] and has
a payment channel design at [5].
regards,
-John
[1] https://github.com/antiochp/grin-rfcs/blob/relative_lock_heights/text/0000-relative-kernels.md
[2] https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin-rfcs/pull/19
[3] https://gist.github.com/antiochp/e54fece52dc408d738bf434a14680988
[4] https://github.com/BeamMW/beam/releases/tag/beam-3.0.5654
[5] https://docs.beam.mw/laser_beam.pdf
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-19 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1791.1568888841.8631.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 11:16 ` John Tromp [this message]
2019-09-19 15:15 ` [bitcoin-dev] Timelocks and Lightning on MimbleWimble ZmnSCPxj
2019-09-19 15:47 ` John Tromp
2019-09-20 5:14 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-09-19 7:52 ZmnSCPxj
2019-09-19 8:39 ` Martin Schwarz
2019-09-19 18:54 ` Lloyd Fournier
2019-09-20 12:22 ` Andrew Poelstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOU__fw11EmAJzay7-H7X3my5+xNGGo_BS6_1hphauPXTgbw8Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=john.tromp@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox